Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.
Opponents of technology advocate that technology not only alienate people, but also degrade relationship. Nevertheless, it is the view of the minority. The census regarding technology is in favor of its benefits of maintaining long distance relationships with friends and family members as well as finding love.
Today's technology has yet to disappoint us. It has allowed family and friends that are thousands of miles away to connect and share the precious moment of life. Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and Snapchat are all popular social media platforms for peers to stay informed with currents event of one's life. Facebook allows instant messages and pictures to be shared and there is no grandparents that would no enjoy using their Iphone to see their grandchildren given the distance. Indeed, the time it will require to travel from France to Miami, for instance, is about eight hours and is very significant considering that connection can be made almost instantaneously using video camera. Social media platforms have allowed people to form a net in which they are all connected to.
In addition, technology rendered finding one's soulmate an easier task. Countless website are dominating the web and allowing people who are looking for a loving relationship to meet. Match.com or Christian mangle are a few of many such websites. The probability of finding true love in a random life event with all the "check list" criteria that are so singular and peculiar to an individual is very low. This websites enables for people to optimize their chances by reviewing their contenders' profile. In fact, strong relationships have a greater chance to form since the match can be "pre-selected" with those ideal criteria.
Though, technology has allowed connection to form, it has yet to prove flawless. Online chats have often replaced face-to-face traditional communication methods. Job interviews have even join the race and interviewers can get pre-selected through Skype conference. It can be of a disadvantage since it does reflect the depict the entire picture. Indeed, let us assume that George has an interview for an accounting firm. He may be well taken care of, wearing a suit and elegantly dressed while looking straight at the camera but looking down at the table he is bending over, he may be drinking a glass of alcohol at 9 am in the morning. Technology can be deceiving and may not provide the full story.
Technological advances have allowed for friends and family to share and connect over long distances. People can meet and fall in love on dating website and share unique moments. However, it has limitations as it does not paint the entire frame that subsume an individual.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...acebook, Twitter, Instagram and Snapchat are all popular social media platforms f...
^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...to stay informed with currents event of ones life. Facebook allows instant messages ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are no grandparents'?
Suggestion: there are no grandparents
... messages and pictures to be shared and there is no grandparents that would no enjoy using their Iphone ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'traveling', 'travelling'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: traveling; travelling
...tance. Indeed, the time it will require to travel from France to Miami, for instance, is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...n addition, technology rendered finding ones soulmate an easier task. Countless webs...
^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
... peculiar to an individual is very low. This websites enables for people to optimize...
^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'enable'.
Suggestion: enable
...n individual is very low. This websites enables for people to optimize their chances by...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'joined'.
Suggestion: joined
...ation methods. Job interviews have even join the race and interviewers can get pre-s...
^^^^
Line 7, column 316, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...of a disadvantage since it does reflect the depict the entire picture. Indeed, let us assu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 619, Rule ID: AM_IN_THE_MORNING[1]
Message: Use simply 'am'.
Suggestion: am
...may be drinking a glass of alcohol at 9 am in the morning. Technology can be deceiving and may no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2285.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18140589569 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00442305015 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 215.323595506 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578231292517 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.7812887542 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.64 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181921923096 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516206852594 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390288728879 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103516875402 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237352534822 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.