Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Regarding the use of technology, there are two confliction views. Some people are inclined toward the opinion that increases the use of technology is not an effective way for interaction with other people. Others, on the other hand, take a radically different view and allege that technology is the best way to be in a close contact with humans. In what follow, first the justification of each side is delineated, later on, my personal perspective having been inspired by the rationale of each side, is explicated.
To commence with, in today's hectic city of life, technology has penetrated every single facet of our lives and influenced our lives vigorously. Although it causes some favorable consequences in our lives, it creates some problems and has deleterious effects on our day to day life. Broadly speaking, with the advent of new technology gone are the days that people gathered and get informed of many things that happened to them. As a tangible example, Today's, due to mobile phones and internet hardly people meet each other and go through discussion. Not only can these technologies destroy our relationship but also can destroy our social skills. In fact, human beings nowadays are more dependent on gadgets, which affect their lives negatively. To elucidate more on this issue, rely too much on technology is not an effective way to learn how to behave and how to interact with people because hardly can people learn social activities with technological advancement.
On the other hand, technology is an integral part of every given society and our lives seem to be paralyzed without sophisticated technology. If we take a minute to ponder over it, technology provides an opportunity for us to make a progress day in day out and reach the pinnacle of our lives. For instance, internet access provides fertile ground for people easily and quickly talk to each other even from far places. Indeed, my border is studying at a university abroad and we easily communicate with each other whenever we want and like with the internet. We should just imagine without the use of the internet to the extent people had to spend a vast sum of money to interact with others. Delve further not the issue, not only does technology provides an opportunity for us to be in a close contact with other but also helps humans to address different trials and tribulations.
Personally, I lodge myself somewhere between these two views. If people rely too much on technology, they cannot grow maturely and will not be able to learn how to interact with different kinds of people with different attitudes and passions. Also, without technology we cannot get inform of many things that happen to our family and friends and be deprive of such technology might be costly. So, people have to strike a balance and bend over backward to use appropriately from any kind of technology. In this case, not only can they learn how to interact with people but also can communicate with others in faraway places.
In light of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 748, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provide'?
Suggestion: provide
...not the issue, not only does technology provides an opportunity for us to be in a close ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 748, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provide'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: provide
...not the issue, not only does technology provides an opportunity for us to be in a close ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 49, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of reasons elaborated, I reiterate that
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, broadly speaking, for instance, in fact, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2542.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 514.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94552529183 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76146701107 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7339497192 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498054474708 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 827.1 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4262250434 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.52173913 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.347826087 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52173913043 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.390499601384 0.243740707755 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111375465442 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718358215278 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202214652323 0.150359130593 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107464431257 0.0667264976115 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.