Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with

This topic raises the controversial issue whether increase use of technology reduces human interaction, in contrast some people believe that technology provides better ways to communicate and connect with each other. Indisputably, the role of technology on our life's is important and its effect to facilitate our daily living. Hence, I totally agree that technology helps people to communicate each other in different purposes. However, this essay will elaborate my reasons and examples clearly.

To begin with, it is irrefutable the importance of technology in our life and amount of benefits that we are used. Then, the definition of human interaction is any physical or non physical contact and the goal from it, is to share ideas, information, knowledge, and feelings. Further illustration, sharing information while we are living in dynamic and speedy world, assures that the shape of interacting has to be very effective and fast that enhance the communication between people by using technology.

Furthermore, the second vital point that should be taken into account is using technology save a lot of money and time. In other words, instead of travail from country to country there is an on-line courses and classes that you can take it while you are at home. One vivid example is this exam that from my home country and by using computer and internet connection I can contact easily and without travailing to USA to take it. In sum, I am trying to philosophize that using technology save a lot of effort and time.

Last but not least, the contrary point of view would reveal some aspects such as communication via technology may decrease the physical and emotional contact between people. This is true if we do not aware that there are a lot of benefit from using technology. For instance, some of complicated operations are done by using small camera and network. Thus, using technology is very cardinal in our life.Consequently, it is hard to take their opinion into considerations.

In conclusion, due to aforementioned reasons and examples, it is pretty obvious the the crucial roles of technology in our daily lives and its impacts to prosper our life. Such as, saving time, effort, money and sharing knowledge and new sciences.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n dynamic and speedy world, assures that the shape of interacting has to be very ...
^^
Line 8, column 403, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Consequently
...technology is very cardinal in our life.Consequently, it is hard to take their opinion into ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 81, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...sons and examples, it is pretty obvious the the crucial roles of technology in our dail...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 81, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...sons and examples, it is pretty obvious the the crucial roles of technology in our dail...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, thus, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in other words, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1891.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12466124661 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93674922339 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563685636856 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 615.6 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9565064161 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.235294118 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2941176471 5.21951772744 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368336153681 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106505185636 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120842645257 0.0758088955206 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194424979946 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142280793718 0.0667264976115 213% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.