Critical thinking and education grounded on the morality are compatible. In fact, they are complementary for each other. The education should consider the morality as their primary goal, and at the same time, the teaching of critical thinking should be an ancillary method in process of actualizing the morality.
There are two goal in education, First, the purpose of the education is to establish and retain the cooperative and harmonious society. Second, At the same time, it should contribute to individuals' happiness. The education respects the value of morality is effective for these two purposes mentioned above. For example, by encouraging students to participates volunteering activities, the educators can cultivate the spirit of cooperation. Moreover, these activities to attempts to coexist with the members who are in the poor condition are also helpful to make sustainable society. Moreover, by teaching the value of the morality, instructor can provide students with opportunities to feel the fact that the experiences to give positive effects on others commit to the enhancing the value of the life. By learning important methods to feel the sense of value in the life, young students can be more happier.
On the other hand, logical reasoning are also important in regard with accomplishment of the purposes of education. Because the logical reasoning is the basic ability to figure out what is desirable. Futhermore, the critical thinking is an efficient tool to adjust the opinions if there are conflicts between others. Also, the logic can be used as a tool to solve problems which are occurred in course of practicing morality in the reality. Unless the school invest their effort in disciplining logical thinking, many students would be people who have good intent only, but do not know how to actualize their good intent.
All in all, as the education based on morality is laudable for society and individuals' happiness both, the morality should be the purpose of the education. On the other hand, in actualizing the morality in reality and in dealing with the problems that we may face in materialize the purpose, the logical thinking is important. Therefore, the teaching curriculum for critical thinking should be provided to students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 584, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...so helpful to make sustainable society. Moreover, by teaching the value of the morality,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 896, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'happier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: happier
...alue in the life, young students can be more happier. On the other hand, logical reas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 910, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fe, young students can be more happier. On the other hand, logical reasoning are...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...plishment of the purposes of education. Because the logical reasoning is the basic abil...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, for example, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 33.0505617978 30% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1910.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27624309392 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92002409303 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5847784466 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210405153442 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0638856001666 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408589735044 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134502860999 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033185296578 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.