Some people believe that traveling to and living in numerous places increases one's ability to relate and connect to other people. Others believe that this ability is better cultivated by living in one place and developing a deep understanding of that community.
Traveling to various places and then interacting with other people and then connecting with other people has become an ability to relate and connect to other people. As the author has given the inputs of a variety of two types of people. One of type of the people believes that traveling to and living in numerous places increases one’s ability to relate and connect to other people. Another type of people believe that this ability is better cultivated and experienced by living in one place and developing a deep understanding of that community.
Clearly, it can be understood that there are two opposing ideas mentioned in the author’s statement. As one of the group of people believes that traveling to and living in numerous place increases one’s ability to relate, to interact and to connect with other people. But further deep diving into this topic we can also get to know that, due to this practice of traveling and living to different places it will result in a short term of stay in a specific - community, area, city, state and country. By following this a person might just be able to interact and connect with that specifc community for few days and then will fail to keep in much contact with them. This will result into a short term of the relationship as every time he/she might travel to a different place and then connect with different people and then would keep on continuing that on a loop.
As Secondly, on the other hand considering the belief of the other group of people it seems to be agreeable to the fact that a person living at the same place with the same community, followed by numerous number of years. It becomes easy for that person to be comfortable with his/her surroundings and maintain a nice well maintained a relationship with other people living around them. This can be considered as an ability to relate and connect with other people easily as they also seemingly are considered as a part of a family for them. They can share any type of happy or sad experience and life events with them comfortably.
When people keeps on just traveling and engaging it becomes a short term part of their relationship with they people they get connected to. On the other hand the people who live at a specific place and engage with the community around them becomes a long term part of their relationship with the people they are connected to. They can be considered as their all time helpful people on the other hand the people whom they travel and meet and then keep on to travel to different place might also be not available when in need.
Concluding this above author’s mentioned statement it becomes clear in mind that the belief about the one’s abilty of relating and connecting with other people is way better cultivated by living in a specific place and deep understanding of that community can be followed. Which weakens the other's belief about relationship scenarios about traveling and engaging with different people and their abilty to connect with them.
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of Alta Manufacturing During the past year Alta Manufacturing had thirty percent more on the job accidents than nearby Panoply Industries where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours Experts b72
- The following is taken fromamemo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any othe60
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in themasense of cooperation not competition54
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 54
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 167, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... to relate and connect to other people. As the author has given the inputs of a va...
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding community'?
Suggestion: the surrounding community
...ive at a specific place and engage with the community around them becomes a long term part of their relat...
Line 5, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...ght also be not available when in need. Concluding this above author’s mentioned...
Line 6, column 292, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...nity can be followed. Which weakens the others belief about relationship scenarios abo...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, then, well, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 95.0 58.6224719101 162% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2491.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 522.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77203065134 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56041150464 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.350574712644 0.4932671777 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 792.0 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.5026408852 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.388888889 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 23.4991977007 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.479714400594 0.243740707755 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213245898005 0.0831039109588 257% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.202070764516 0.0758088955206 267% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.336857318859 0.150359130593 224% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172486783671 0.0667264976115 258% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.