The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government,industry,or other fields is by instilling in themasense of cooperation,not competition.
Given in the issue the author states about the best possible way to prepare young people for leadership in any of the fields. It can clearly be seen that young people can become a best leader if he/she is cooperative rather than competitive in nature. For a successful leader, trust is clearly a factor which can't be bought, it can always be gained.
It is definitely true the first quality required in a leader is he should take the other persons with him and then move forward. The competitor always focuses on leaving the other people behind and try to move forward. The leader always focuses on other persons welfare, cooperate with them and try to engage with them also. On the other hand a competitor always focuses on his own success only. A competitor never cares about what happens with other people he keeps on focusing achievements, happiness in his own life.
Secondly, people would always prefer someone as a leader whom they find cooperative, whom they have their belief, whom they think would be clearly relied upon. A leader is the one, who requires certain quality in oneself. Whenever choosing a leader, people always keep in mind that whom they are choosing would be capable of handle, help them. No one, would like to make someone a leader who always keeps of thinking his own progress. People always eschew those type of competitor.
Thirdly, consider a leader who is selected as your country Prime Minister. He/She would get to that position just by gaining people love, belief, support. If he/she would just focused on adding competition to the opposing party he/she would not be at the position they are. As, they might have done some welfare of the people, help the ones in need have got a better chance to prove himself as a best candidate role for a leader. Being competitive might sometimes led you to the downfall in your field rather than having much qualities.
Consider a young adroit in an industry, who is master in his field but is always competitive. He/She will always look for themselves to succeed more and more and will left behind what is right for other people. On the other a hand a person who is cooperative with his other co-workers, would be considered a better choice to be a leader because rather than just succeeding he would take care that how he would have worked that also helps other working with him.
Concluding, we can clearly say that to prepare young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields they should be cooperative and not competitive. For a successful leader they should be properly working with other persons by seeing their happiness also not only self happiness as a competitor.
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework whereas in the district of Marlee most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no mo65
- The following is taken fromamemo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any othe60
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people58
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state50
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of a company that specializes in the delivery of heating oil Most homes in the northeastern United States where winters are typically cold have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heati59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
...ly be seen that young people can become a best leader if he/she is cooperative ra...
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: CANT
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...leader, trust is clearly a factor which cant be bought, it can always be gained. ...
Line 3, column 320, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...e with them and try to engage with them also. On the other hand a competitor always ...
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y gaining people love, belief, support. If he/she would just focused on adding com...
Line 7, column 395, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
...got a better chance to prove himself as a best candidate role for a leader. Being...
Line 7, column 522, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
...wnfall in your field rather than having much qualities. Consider a young adroit i...
Line 9, column 168, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'leave'
...elves to succeed more and more and will left behind what is right for other people. ...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2220.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 462.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80519480519 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63618218583 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47664830932 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450216450216 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 689.4 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9484335525 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5217391304 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0869565217 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86956521739 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211991000481 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751193132892 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802625321858 0.0758088955206 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140015551013 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856687456686 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.