Democracy is the government by the people, of the people and for the people. The very essence of today's politics is governed by the factor that we find common ground and reach reasonable consensus. Anything other than that may lead to fascism in which one ideology is superimposed on the people who may not believe in it, it would be no better than monarchy. Pursuit of an ideal is an abstract idea that may mislead to dogmatism and political sanctimoniousness. It is precisely how tyrants were born in the history and fascism spreads.
Firstly, it is important to realise that an ideal thing is subjective and the definition of idealism varies from person to person. For example, in my childhood days when going to school was mandatory, for me the ideal was to have the freedom to choose if one wants to go to school or not. With my parochial and naive understanding, I couldnot think of the benifits of having education. Therefore, my ideal was shaped with my limited understanding. Similarly, every individual has his or her own set of ideals which is governed by what his life time experiences and circumstances. Ideal for one, cannot be an ideal for all unanimously. These conflicting ideals can not be reconciled inorder to have a smooth and peaceful governance based on the pursuit of ideal. Hence, the goal of politics to be the pursuit of an ideal is quixotic and lacks pragmatism.
Secondly, if we pursue an ideal as the goal of politics, there would always be marginalisation of a section of people with conflicting ideology. These minorities would feel suffocated bt the hegemony of a single ideal being pursued. For instance, the BJP government in India has a ideology of 'Hindutva' which sidelines people of other religions and beliefs. Since the BJP government has come to power there has been numerous cases of communal tension in the country. This growing insecurity amongst the minority sections of the nation takes away peace and tranquility and a sense of security amongst the citizens. Similarly, we can see the same pattern throughout the course of history like Nazi rule, Sharia laws in the middle eastern countries etc. Pursuit of an ideal always leads to oppression of the minorities and therefore, an tumultous government. Thus, the goal should be a democratic way of finding common ground and reaching reasonable consesus.
However, there are also cases when a democratic way of finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus have proved to be failure. There are drawbacks attached to this side as well. The legal procedures have to go through a long discussions and in order to get the majority on one point is very difficult game. To understand better, let us look at India, the biggerst democracy of the world. GST bill which is recently passed was tabled in 1999. It took 17 years to take that step which could be very quick in a political system rum by ideals. Moreover, there are quite significant chance of the politics that finds common ground and is run by consensus to go wrong. Afterall, majority is not always right.
In conclusion, although a political system that aims at finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus may not be the best thing ubiquitously for it is slower in action and may lead to precarious decisions sometimes, but it is definitely much better than a political system in pursuit of an ideal which can lead to dogmatism, fascism or worse, a tyrannous rule.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 540, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
...of ideals which is governed by what his life time experiences and circumstances. Ideal fo...
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
...stance, the BJP government in India has a ideology of Hindutva which sidelines pe...
Line 5, column 358, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... people of other religions and beliefs. Since the BJP government has come to power th...
Line 5, column 831, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
...ession of the minorities and therefore, an tumultous government. Thus, the goal sh...
Line 7, column 675, Rule ID: AFTERALL
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...nd and is run by consensus to go wrong. Afterall, majority is not always right. In co...
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'similarly', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'as to', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238689547582 0.240241500013 99% => OK
Verbs: 0.160686427457 0.157235817809 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0826833073323 0.0880659088768 94% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0546021840874 0.0497285424764 110% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0312012480499 0.0444667217837 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115444617785 0.12292977631 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0452418096724 0.0406280797675 111% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84227955736 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0343213728549 0.030933414821 111% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0998439937598 0.0997080785238 100% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0218408736349 0.0249443105267 88% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0218408736349 0.0148568991511 147% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3448.0 2732.02544248 126% => OK
No of words: 584.0 452.878318584 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90410958904 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.91590194646 4.58838876751 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.356164383562 0.366273622748 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.26198630137 0.280924506359 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.203767123288 0.200843997647 101% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.138698630137 0.132149295362 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84227955736 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 285.0 219.290929204 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.48801369863 0.48968727796 100% => OK
Word variations: 59.686675279 55.4138127331 108% => OK
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6194690265 145% => OK
Sentence length: 19.4666666667 23.380412469 83% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6189294417 59.4972553346 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.933333333 141.124799967 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4666666667 23.380412469 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.7 0.674092028746 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 45.6652968037 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.62025316456 1.64882698954 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461587799195 0.391690518653 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.112793419037 0.123202303941 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.106482170886 0.077325440228 138% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.48036353751 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.155113050181 0.149214159877 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.166431456988 0.161403998019 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960032528948 0.0892212321368 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.398677701702 0.385218514788 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0529283661076 0.0692045440612 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316496081943 0.275328986314 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0754368144468 0.0653680567796 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 21.0 10.4325221239 201% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 16.0 7.22455752212 221% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.66592920354 82% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 13.5995575221 154% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.