The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but the general well-being of all its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
In today’s fast paced world, most of the developing countries all around the globe are moving along with their rapidly growing technologies. Most of the politicians in the countries surely support these advents of the technologies. They truly encourage scientists for new innovations and inventions nowadays. Additionally, other group of people who help to reflect the real picture of societies are artists like poets, celebrities, writers. I mostly agree with the author of the prompt that the country is considered a great one when it surely possesses the overall progress at all levels such as social, economic, and political. But at the same time, the ultimate goal of the progress wholistically can be seen as a well-being of the ordinary people living in the country. I would like to support the same with two major reasons.
First, the nation is made by all the people living there from different cultures, diversities, and ethnicities. So, only success of couple of fields cannot be considered as a great marker of a successful country. I would like to elucidate it with the example from the past, Adolf Hitler was a rude but successful ruler from the history of Russia and Germany. He was greatly appreciated for his elocutions to spread his strong opinions about Nazism. Youth of the country was galvanized with his speeches. But at the same time, though his achievements were great as a leader, country was not considered as great. The only reason I could see that he was from a dictatorship ground and ordinary people were unable to follow him as many rules are against general well-being of humanity.
Secondly, though the success from different fields is appreciable at global levels, if the people living in the societies are not able to use those facilities to make progress in their lives, then I believe surely, it can’t be considered as a successful country. For instance, in India, during Pandemic in 2020, Nation’s politicians actually backed up the inventions to find out effective but affordable vaccines. Scientists from Bharat Biotech and other institutes found vaccines Covisheild and Covaxin, which ordinary people can afford on large scales, even in rural areas of the country. So, this example can show that the end goal of the achievements should be wellbeing of people, not just successful invention. It indicates that the greatness of the country depends on inventions converted into facilities from people.
Thirdly, if I consider artists such as filmmakers or celebrities from movies, they can clearly reflect the social problems in their films, which is helpful to initiate a change and give away a powerful message to the society. For instance, the film, Kashmir Files, though the film is appreciated at different film festivals by critics, people from different societies in the country could censure it because it openly shows casteism related problems in India. Hence, though artists are successful, the society can’t be, as far as greatness is considered.
To conclude, I can agree on the statement that the successful stories of its rulers, artists, or scientists certainly help to understand the greatness of the country but the general well-being of all the people living there can be the important indicator for it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In today’s fast paced world, most of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pport the same with two major reasons. First, the nation is made by all the peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gainst general well-being of humanity. Secondly, though the success from differ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...converted into facilities from people. Thirdly, if I consider artists such as f...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, as far as greatness is considered. To conclude, I can agree on the statemen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, well, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2741.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 533.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1425891182 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80487177365 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83035919867 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487804878049 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 838.8 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4810258701 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.173913043 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1739130435 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52173913043 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212089850849 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604053244786 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504089466418 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135314897343 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674433094627 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 100.480337079 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.