The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Politicians and professionals are the most noticiable group of people in any country. The prompt claims that the greatness of a nation can not be accurately represented by the achievement of rulers, artists and scientists, but the overall welfare of general people portrays the true indication. I mostly agree with the claim, primarily due to two major reasons listed below. However, I do concede that in cases of already developed and great nations, these two factors might coincide.
First of all, for any nation, the true indication of its greatness can not be gauzed by the achievement of its rulers, artists, or scientists, because, usually, these people comprise of a very less percentage of the total population of the nation. Let's say, within 1% of the whole population. How can anyone predict the condition and well-being of the whole nation based on the observation of mere 1% of population? For instance, India is one of the rapidly growing nation with a lot of great scientists, well-known artists, and famous politicians. However, it is still one of the country where a vast amount of people are fighting against poverty and other social issues. So, probably, the number of scientists and famous politicians might not be the true indication of welfare of people in grassroot level. This is just an example of how such generalization can go wrong. There are multiple such cases around the world. So, the true indication of the welfare of any nation would be represented only by the observation of its people from grassroot leve, preferably the rural area.
moreover, a nation is represented not only by its urban area. For a nation to be considered great, it must be capable of ensuring all round well-being of the people in urban as well as rural area. In the claim made by the prompt, there is no consideration of diversity factor. The group of artists, scientists and politicians basically represent the urban life of a nation, leaving out a large chunk of rustic lifestyle. The people in rural areas are unperturbed by any peripheral issues. For example, most of the rural areas in the African countries do not even have arrangements of basic needs like food, shelter, education, etc. Still, many of those countries are not short of great politicians and world famous artists or professionals. For those countries to be considered great, it is essential to fulfill the basic needs of majority of people, if not for all and ensure that the prosperity covers the rural areas as well.
Admittedly, there could be a few exceptions like in case of scandinavian countries like Norway, Sweden, etc. who have mastered the art of promoting their scientist, artists, and politicians in international arena for great achievements, while also ensuring that the rural parts of the country get equal attention. They are the epitome of balanced and all round well-being.
To conclude, for any nation to be considered great, it is essential to consider the major factors related with its people. The well-being and happiness of the people exhibit a clear picture of how great the nation is, rather than the achievements of a few scientists, artists and politicians.
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent During the same year Omni showed a significant 58
- Claim Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual actually turns out to be inaccurate Write a response in which you discus70
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your posi75
- Evidence suggests that academic honor codes which call for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeavors and to notify a faculty member if they suspect that others have cheated are far more successful than are other methods at deterring cheat64
- Workers in the small town of Leeville take fewer sick days than workers in the large city of Masonton 50 miles away Moreover relative to population size the diagnosis of stress related illness is proportionally much lower in Leeville than in Masonton Acco73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 175, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...entists, because, usually, these people comprise of a very less percentage of the total pop...
Line 2, column 248, Rule ID: LETS_LET
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
... of the total population of the nation. Lets say, within 1% of the whole population....
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
...sroot leve, preferably the rural area. moreover, a nation is represented not only by it...
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...perity covers the rural areas as well. Admittedly, there could be a few excepti...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2646.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 528.0 442.535393258 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01136363636 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79356345386 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90438925221 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.452651515152 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 827.1 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9970982349 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.769230769 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3076923077 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206708744255 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0619280362642 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609330368276 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129695829699 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061049700621 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 100.480337079 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.