The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people.
In the above statement, the author contends that it is the general welfare of the citizen that indicates the degree of a great nation, not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists. However, the following essay will contend that it is plausible to disagree with the author's statement.
Admittedly, since the rulers, artists, and scientists does not represent a general citizen, it is hard to say that solely by looking at the leaders of their own concentration, one can appraise a nation's strength. Most of the renown scientists are the ones with an innately high creativity and IQs, anomalous to a general citizen. So they do not owe their contributions toward their nation by the country's capacity, but their own ability. Not only scientists, but a country's ruler as well. A country's ruler can be a very political leader, such as a woman leader in the Southeast Asia. Although she was famous for a progressive, impartial, democratic leader, the country in the Southeast of Asia is not as strong as the countries which leaders with similar knacks.
However, the above example is a mere occurring case. Most of the greatest leaders of a country in their own field comes from the countries with a strong capacity of knowledge, ability to hold cultural activities. For example, famous artists come from Europe where the countries have been retaining their culture as in the past. Also, scientists are mostly from where there are a hale base of science and technology. Therefore, car manufacturing companies are usually in Germany, France, and mostly in their vicinity.
In addition, countries utilize the leaders, artists, scientist's contribution and let their country be stronger.
Comments
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
The essay lost some content. Need more paragraphs.
and better not put the outlines inside essays. The e-grader can't figure it out.
----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ? out of 6
Category: ? Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 278 350
No. of Characters: 1380 1500
No. of Different Words: 146 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.083 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.964 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.769 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 108 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 87 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 55 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.034 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.643 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.333 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.547 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.098 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y such as US, or in Europe, deductively/ nations utilize what their rulers, artis...
^^^
Line 6, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...at it is plausible to disagree with the authors statement. Admittedly, since the ru...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 196, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...r own concentration, one can appraise a nations strength. Most of the renown scientists...
^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 385, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'bases'?
Suggestion: bases
... are mostly from where there are a hale base of science and technology. Therefore, c...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'well', 'for example', 'in addition', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.258883248731 0.240241500013 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.104060913706 0.157235817809 66% => OK
Adjectives: 0.104060913706 0.0880659088768 118% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0507614213198 0.0497285424764 102% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0380710659898 0.0444667217837 86% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126903553299 0.12292977631 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0177664974619 0.0406280797675 44% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.88966589543 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.010152284264 0.030933414821 33% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00253807106599 0.0016655270985 152% => OK
Determiners: 0.11421319797 0.0997080785238 115% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.010152284264 0.0249443105267 41% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0126903553299 0.0148568991511 85% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2101.0 2732.02544248 77% => OK
No of words: 341.0 452.878318584 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.16129032258 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.392961876833 0.366273622748 107% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.343108504399 0.280924506359 122% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.225806451613 0.200843997647 112% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.149560117302 0.132149295362 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88966589543 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 219.290929204 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504398826979 0.48968727796 103% => OK
Word variations: 52.5573055617 55.4138127331 95% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6194690265 78% => OK
Sentence length: 21.3125 23.380412469 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1287582261 59.4972553346 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.3125 141.124799967 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 23.380412469 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.625 0.674092028746 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.94800884956 141% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 55.6233504399 51.4728631049 108% => OK
Elegance: 2.09210526316 1.64882698954 127% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491587593532 0.391690518653 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.170322783172 0.123202303941 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0820107203526 0.077325440228 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.627093323145 0.547984918172 114% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.249540805015 0.149214159877 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189152491454 0.161403998019 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146182619571 0.0892212321368 164% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.274815657403 0.385218514788 71% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.124329160371 0.0692045440612 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260355206254 0.275328986314 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150601713038 0.0653680567796 230% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.4325221239 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.5995575221 96% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.