Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Main responsibility of a teacher is to teach his or her student properly and make his or her course fathomable to their students. The prompt stated that salary of teacher should be based on the performance of their students. I mostly support on this statement for two reasons.

Firstly, performance of students in a course mostly depends on the capability of that course teacher. Is the course teacher able to make his or her course understandable to his student or the student are able to getting what the teacher want to teach them? For instance, a chemical engineering teacher want to teach about control valve. There are a lot of abstruse material in this course like how feed forward valve function, how a control valve response to input signal etc. The target of this course teacher is to answer this entire question and to give a lucid picture of different kinds of control valve and their actual behavior in a process plant. If after completion these course students are not, getting the complex attitude of control valve, they have still a lot of question about different topics of process control then it is obvious that students will end up with poor result. If teacher was able to give insightful lecture, an elucidate lecture students will understand the course and can make a good result. So clearly, it is the failure of the teacher for lower performance of the students.

Secondly, one may say a student can do badly because of his or her disability, of course I accede to this point my point is about the whole class. Whole class cannot get a lower gpa at a time. Naturally a class consist of students that some are good, some average and some are below average. For instance, there are 50 students on that mentioned course and most of them are end up with grade C or B-, it is not seemly. It is predictable that the grading graph would follow bell shaped curve. This the failure of that particular teacher. The whole class get a poor grade just because of incapability of the teacher.

However, performance of students is not the only criteria to judge a teacher. Teacher’s behavior towards students, depth of knowledge about his or her subject, research works etc. need to be taken into measurement. A teacher who teaches well and students of his or her course get a good grade but his behavior toward students is abysmal. Of course, this kind of behavior is questionable for that teacher. A teacher may give a good grade to his student it does not prove that the teacher have depth knowledge about his subject. So other than students’ performance there are other criteria which need to take into account to evaluate a teacher.

It is true that a teacher should be evaluated by many criteria other than student’s performance but student’s performance is the fundamental measure. Therefore, salary of a teacher should be based on student’s performance.

Votes

Essay Categories

GMAT/GRE Issue Task

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 941, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...er was able to give insightful lecture, an elucidate lecture students will understand the co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, for instance, kind of, of course, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 33.0505617978 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2401.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 498.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82128514056 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72397222731 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69249255093 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.415662650602 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 745.2 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7547500755 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9259259259 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197853743597 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735198497903 0.0831039109588 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707163510241 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15679996729 0.150359130593 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809341567418 0.0667264976115 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, well, for instance, kind of, of course, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments