Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The role a teacher plays in a students growth is imperative and may also be viewed as irreplacable. The given prompt suggests that a tecaher's worth be decided based on how well the students of his/her class are performing. I strongly disagree with this stance as there is a high chance that this method of encouraging teacher's to perform well in their jobs may backfire due to the following two reasons.
Firstly, having a scale (in this case, the academic performance of students) which decides a teacher's ability can create a competitive environment among teachers, who now will try their best to ensure that their students score as high as possible because it is not just their salary that is on line here but also their worth as a teacher. This may sound good in the beginning as teachers will be trying to enhance every students performance but it won't be long before some teachers might do just about anything to achieve this goal. Few teachers may even make the testing or syllabus easier for students to score marks. This eventually will only lead to some teachers not being interested in edifying the pupils, instead, only caring about the results of an exam. As explained, this strategy might work initially in creating a fervid environment among teachers but can soon turn out to be detrimental to students' learning.
Even if we take a leap of faith and believe that teachers will not get into a rat race for their salaries and work with probity, we cannot decide a teacher's worth based on the academic performace of his/ her students. Take for example, it is possible that a teacher might have a class of students who are rather slow in studies. No matter how hard the teachers tries, there is only so much that he/she can do to improve their performance within a year. A very diligent teacher might be successful in bringing up the class average from 40% to 60% but this teacher will not be credited as much as another teacher who had a class with a decrease in average from 80% to 70%. At the end of the year, the teacher of the class who's average alleviated will recieve a higher salary and this can effect the morale of the sabulous teacher. Clearly, this metric of deciding salaries based on the students' performance is flawed.
In conclusion, the above two reasons clearly indicate why a competition among teachers should not be created as there is a chance that this may effect the morale of some teachers and also hamper the students' education. Therefore, I believe that deciding teacher's salary based on the marksheet of his/ her students may not be a advantageous idea.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
The role a teacher plays in a students growth is imperative and may also be vi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 92, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...performance of students which decides a teachers ability can create a competitive enviro...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...eachers will be trying to enhance every students performance but it wont be long before ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 721, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...d of the year, the teacher of the class whos average alleviated will recieve a highe...
^^^^
Line 5, column 885, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...etric of deciding salaries based on the students performance is flawed. In conclusion...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 145, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...ated as there is a chance that this may effect the morale of some teachers and also ha...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...le of some teachers and also hamper the students education. Therefore, I believe that de...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rksheet of his/ her students may not be a advantageous idea.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71208791209 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56350427348 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463736263736 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.9 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.128558068 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4375 23.4991977007 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248025734344 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100037236997 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369607776514 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175672244639 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0125048009449 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.1639044944 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.