Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Instructions
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The author’s argument that those who see their ideas through regardless of criticism and doubts of others will leave lasting legacies has reigned true throughout history. All over the world, millions of people have ideas with the potential to be great, but so many of these ideas are left by the wayside at the first mention of criticism, or the first hint of doubt and discouragement. However, when a person sticks by their idea and fights for it, that idea often breaks through the bounds of mediocrity and becomes something great, moving, and important to society.
The world today is not an overwhelmingly friendly place, and in our fast paced and largely capitalistic society, there is immense competition. Those who are able to rise to the top of the competition are those who are willing to fight for their ideas and resist against those who want to brush them aside. The people who are willing to see their ideas through are often the leaders, the legacies, and the lead characters in inspirational stories of determination and perseverance.
There are many compelling examples of ideas that received much criticism and even hatred, but then ended up being revolutionary. The Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. was a strong advocate for equal rights among races, but his opinion was not popular among the majority of the dominant white population. Thousands of people not only critiqued his viewpoint, but also even harassed and incited violence towards him and his followers due to his ideas. If Martin Luther King had given up on his ideas and retreated from the violence and hatred he was facing, the civil rights movement would surely not be what is was. However, he and his followers were steadfast in their beliefs, and Martin Luther King Jr. is now a name known and taught to everyone in the United States.
A consequence of this belief, however, is the possibility that those who stand by their ideas regardless of criticism may not ever be willing to improve their ideas. Without criticism, ideas may become stagnant and surface level – it is the criticism that allows for improvement and growth, creating something that will stand the test of time.
Overall, the argument works to motivate an encourage people to stand by their ideas in the face of adversity, allowing for greatness. Some of the greatest ideas have been questioned and critiques incessantly, and if the creator had not stood by their ideas, our world would be undoubtedly different.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 606, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
...ights movement would surely not be what is was. However, he and his followers were...
^^
Line 5, column 609, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...ts movement would surely not be what is was. However, he and his followers were ste...
^^^
Line 9, column 41, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...Overall, the argument works to motivate an encourage people to stand by their ideas in the f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, by the way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2071.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 415.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99036144578 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68096086665 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520481927711 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.77640449438 563% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.8226372543 60.3974514979 34% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 138.066666667 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73333333333 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24629920057 0.243740707755 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905235322891 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925649593917 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150423833623 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810738110505 0.0667264976115 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.