Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
Universities require students majoring in Science or Business to enroll in a few courses unrelated to their respective fields. These requirements in Universities to take Humanities courses are a very minimal. Often times, a maximum of two Humanities courses are taken by students during the study. There are advantages as well as disadvantages to this requirement. In my opinion, I support the idea of gaining knowledge outside the major by enrolling in Humanities courses due to several reasons.
To begin, courses of Humanities subjects help a science or a Business major student develop skills that are required in the real world; getting employed after graduation. These skills attainable through Humanities courses help the student deal with his employers, customers, people in immediate job circle, etc. For instance, a doctor needs skills to effectively communicate to treat his or her patients. During such times, psychology or communication courses taken by the doctor during his degree may come in handy. Furthermore, a bank manager needs to communicate with daily customers and satisfy them with their questions. The bank managers or doctors need skills outside their study concentration to deal with customers or patients, respectively. These skills are acquired through the Humanities courses. If such courses are removed from a University's curriculum for Science or Business major students, they may not be able to effectively be able to do their work in the the job market.
Proponents of the claim in the prompt may argue that time and money could be saved by voiding the Humanities courses requirement. As colleges, however, do not require taking more than two or three such courses, time and money spent not necessarily be a disadvantage for a student. If the benefits of such Arts courses are weighed against the disadvantages, then the time as well as money spent will be well worth it.
While time and money is spent on enrolling in Humanities courses for Science or Business major studnets, neither money nor time is necessarily wasted due to the discussion above. Thus, Universities should continue to impose the enrollment requirement of such courses so that a student may develop skills that will help him or her in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 843, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...urses. If such courses are removed from a Universitys curriculum for Science or B...
^
Line 3, column 972, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...effectively be able to do their work in the the job market. Proponents of the claim ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 972, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...effectively be able to do their work in the the job market. Proponents of the claim ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1899.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23140495868 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95126578263 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479338842975 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1632102803 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.5 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287357124701 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100858038199 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0691038322348 0.0758088955206 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19257612741 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450144502574 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.