Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won’t benefit their future careers.
There has always been a debate on what people should study in College. Some defend that a more holistic approach should be taken. However, courses in Humanities should not be mandatory to students majoring in Business or Science. Their attention should be focused on topics related to their future careers and they should not have to pay to something that does not positively impact their required abilities.
Students will acquire skills which will have a greater impact on their future career if they focus their courses in fields related to their major. College experience is already known as very overwhelming and time consuming: in addition to classes, students must write essays, attend seminars, and sometimes research and attend conferences outside of campus. On that matter, having to spend time on classes that are not related to the student’s major will only divide the attention that could have been funneled to developing skills that will be useful to their career in the future. For instance, a student majoring in Physics would have a bigger benefit attending classes on quantic physics and Newtonian laws then political history or social science. The former would develop the knowledge that have a higher chance to be needed after college: it is very unlikely that knowledge on French Revolution will be useful to someone developing a particle accelerator. In addition to attending classes, the time spent on Humanities could be allocated to extracurricular activities as internships that develop vital skills not taught in class.
Besides time and dedication, college also requires a lot of financial expenditure from students. On that matter, more courses in Humanities would generate a higher financial burden on a topic that not necessarily will influence on the career following college. People save for college during their entire life, with situations as extreme as saving money during more than one generation. Thus, inflating the curriculum with courses not related to the major the student is aiming generate more student debt and can ultimately push people away from college.
On the other hand, some say that courses in Humanities are of great importance to anyone’s career: knowledge on aspects as History and Geography should compose a holistic approach mandatory to anyone attending college. That is mostly true, however, mandatory courses in the curriculum of someone graduating in a Sciences major should not be the path to acquire this knowledge. Nowadays, several free sources online can be leveraged to study topics not present at college. This provide a more cost and time efficient manner, since it can be done during any time the student feel the need for it.
In summary, courses in Humanities should not be a part of the curriculum of someone majoring in Business or Sciences. College is very time consuming and courses outside someone’s major will only divide the attention required to excel. In addition, it generates more debt and can ultimately push people away from college. These topics can be covered outside of college if the student feel the need.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 929, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'develops'.
Suggestion: develops
...ch Revolution will be useful to someone developing a particle accelerator. In addition to ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, then, thus, for instance, in addition, in summary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 28.0 12.4196629213 225% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2618.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 500.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.236 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72870804502 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65781865446 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 843.3 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7511161053 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360463477187 0.243740707755 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115896188839 0.0831039109588 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961949952778 0.0758088955206 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.22691416092 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0712979582466 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.