to understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities
In most of countries, major cities have highly developed in lots of fields, such as economy and politics. Therefore, I agree with the statement.
Indeed, some people states that there are many unique local cultures existing in minor cites of a country. If we do not choose to study these minor cities, we may not be able to understand these local cultures. For example, in Taiwan, the Tainan city is famous for many delicious foods, such as beef soups, and many foreign visitors will choose to visit city in order to taste these local foods. If these visitors had not chosen to study the Tainan city, they might have not been able to experience these local cultures.
However, if we study the major cities of a country, we may be able to understand the economic development of this country. For example, when I was an graduate, I studied in National Chiao Tung University which was located in the Hsinchu city. Hsinchu city was famous for its development of semiconductor industry, and many world-class companies located in this city, such as TSMC and Media Tek. TSMC was the largest semiconductor manufacturing enterprise in the entire world, and many first-rate companies were TSMC’s important clients, such as Apple and Nvidia. Therefore, I decided to understand how this company established its own business and its developmental history. Fortunately, when the engineers of TSMC came to our school to recruit new graduates, I could ask them many professional issues about TSMC. With their help, I could understand how this company continually improve its semiconductor technology and compete with other strong competitors, such as Samsung and Intel. By contrast, if I had chosen to study other minor cities in Taiwan, I might have not been able to understand the history of economic development in Hsinchu.
Moreover, if we study the major cities of a country, we can understand the development of politics of this country. For example, when I was an undergraduate, I attended an exchange program in the Berlin. In this exchange program, I wanted to visit many renowned historical sites, such as the Reichstag, in which the German legislation department located. I met lots of German people in this place, and they explained the history of this building to me, they told me how this building was occupied in 1945 by the red army and how Adolf Hitler delivered a speech in this place in 1933. With my German friends’ help, I could totally understand the entire history of Germany from the German Empire to the Third Reich. By contrast, if I had chosen to study an exchange program in other minor Germany cities, I might have not been able to learn the history of the rise and fall of Germany and meet these German friends.
To sum up, I agree with the statement. For one thing, we could understand the economical development of a country by studying its major cities. For another, we could also learn the political development of a country by visiting its major cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 4, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the countries') or simply say ''most countries''.
Suggestion: most of the countries; most countries
In most of countries, major cities have highly developed in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 148, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...f this country. For example, when I was an graduate, I studied in National Chiao T...
^^
Line 9, column 79, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... For one thing, we could understand the economical development of a country by studying it...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, third, for example, such as, for one thing, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2486.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 505.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92277227723 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74048574033 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76346974346 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.421782178218 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 780.3 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 6.24550561798 304% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2455769259 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.086956522 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9565217391 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73913043478 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 16.0 4.83258426966 331% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20571405648 0.243740707755 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678002245468 0.0831039109588 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701743201003 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127669907248 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494936237015 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.