While leadership is one of the qualities that come over time after a lot of experience in that field. But I believe the time is changing at a fast rate and I don't agree that understanding the past won't help in today's placeholder of new leaders.
Primarily, time is in changing in a very fast manner nowadays. The world is busy adjusting to the turbulent flow of time. They are readily adapting this time or they lose their way. Leadership quality is gained by putting a lot of effort into becoming knowledgeable, studying at top ivy colleges, etc. They don't have a very strong that helps them in any way in improving their leadership. Nowadays, it's very common to see that when an industry leader retires from their company they hand over the post to their offspring which they pretty much handle with ease as they gained knowledge from reputed colleges.
Additionally, there are a lot of people who still follow an old tradition in their company to have a generalized function. They are afraid of the results after the changes which is not a good quality of a leader. The past is not helping them in any way.
However, I still believe that there are a lot of places to improve and learn from old mistakes that you make in past. They are the learning that helps to gain an edge over the inexperienced leaders but it is these are also been incorporated in the curriculum of ivy business colleges that do thorough services and case studies which help them take an edge over past mistakes.
In nutshell, we can say that the past is not much of use for the current positions of leaders. They have already learned about those mistakes and the way they can be corrected. The past will hunt you and consume your time which you can use more productively. Therefore, we should step ahead from the past and connect to the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...e time is changing at a fast rate and I dont agree that understanding the past wont ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 308, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...studying at top ivy colleges, etc. They dont have a very strong that helps them in a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 110, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...d learn from old mistakes that you make in past. They are the learning that helps to ga...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, still, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1496.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 328.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56097560976 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53846084512 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521341463415 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.0296554212 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2941176471 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.76470588235 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169747785495 0.243740707755 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568207389362 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756824702655 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100997565029 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797709422567 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.