Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
To make present and future in better shape it is important to understand past and learn from it, so that past mistakes can be avoided, the same is true in leadership positions as well. In leadership positions, leaders change after every few years, and all of them make some promises to make present better of people or team who are electing them. To fulfill those promises they need to make changes in current policies, laws, or in management. The previous leaders must have done the same. Now, if current leaders, take a look at the outcome of past leaders actions and results then it can act as guideline for them to stay reluctant to those mistakes which already happened in the past.
The US election are just got over and new elected president Donold Trump is taking charge of president. His policy during election campaign was very similar to the given statement. He was willing put new policies in action and repel the old ones, without understanding the circumstances and need of those policies. One out of those policies is Obama Care, former president Brack Obama made law that everyone in the country should have health care coverage and he made Obama care act, which provides affordable care to people. Now, elected president was not willing understand past and always campaigning agaist Obama care. After winning election, new president few days understanding, how all the policies are being designed and working right now and he decided he will not repel Obama care. This all happened just because he gave sometime to understand past and then made decision, if he would acted without understanding the past then twenty million people would have lost their health coverage.
Past can be used to learn from mistakes and understand good work to continue doing it, but nobody can stick with it. The leaders cannot stick with it, and continue doing whatever previous leaders have done. It is responsibity of a leader to lead to team to new levels, to do this he need to make new changes, instand of sticking with past rules. Thus for leaders in current positions past has importance to make things better in today.
In conclusion, past has little importance just to learn from it and to be better leader. Completly ignoring past might not help present leader to maintain position.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 896, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'act'
Suggestion: act
...ast and then made decision, if he would acted without understanding the past then twe...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 347, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...s, instand of sticking with past rules. Thus for leaders in current positions past h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, then, thus, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87468030691 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49198058368 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50895140665 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.965375774 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.888888889 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7222222222 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.77777777778 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147458613036 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515734279712 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421485210869 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917834064741 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335844880909 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.