History being so vast, huge and lushtrous with situation and knowledge should not be avoided. But, there are other who believe that we should ignore the history since the similarity between the contemporaries cultures and history is very diminutive. For leadership, i personally believe that looking back to past can sometimes be very helpful. To substantiate my view, i am presenting my reason in the following paragraphs.
To navigate the societies towards developement, people must have a leader who can represent the views of the society to outside world. Not all can become a good leader , a leader must be chosen based on the some qualities, criteria and moral principles. To learn this moral principles and qualities, the leader must look back to standard of the leadership of past leaders. For example, one leader can always look pack to Nelson madela who had not only the courage to fight against the slavery but also had good moral which helped him alot to move forward removing all the obstacles. On the other hand, if a leader does not want to get influenced by the past, he must learn all this qualties with the time.
Referring to the past, the problems faced in the past may have some simiraties with what we have in present. The past can alwasys help a leader to solve such types of problems. Not onle help but the past can also alludes the leader to avoid such solution for the preoblem which have not resulted in betterment. For example, in the empire of king Akbar, the hindu had to pay extra money or tax to visit the temples. To remove this tax problem, Akbar had to face all th eopposition which came from the islamic religion. Not very similar but the same level of opposition was faced in india when government was trying to remove the section 377- a section which is against the LGBT group- a government or consel has to face huge oppposition. On the other side, the solution to both the problem can be very different because of enormous difference in the culture of two contemporaries.
In the end, I believe that looking back to past will help mostly for the leader to maintain a proper moral standards. It may also help leader to solve the precented problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'others'?
Suggestion: others
...e should not be avoided. But, there are other who believe that we should ignore the h...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 370, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... very helpful. To substantiate my view, i am presenting my reason in the followin...
^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... world. Not all can become a good leader , a leader must be chosen based on the so...
^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
... , a leader must be chosen based on the some qualities, criteria and moral principle...
^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'standard'?
Suggestion: standard
...r the leader to maintain a proper moral standards. It may also help leader to solve the p...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, so, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71875 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59190326921 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505208333333 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1084458596 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0906702879968 0.243740707755 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0326145886585 0.0831039109588 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026506148844 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0549812440032 0.150359130593 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.019293134324 0.0667264976115 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.