Leaders play a vital role in the growth and development of any societies or communities or regions. For any leader to be considered as best or worst, it is very important for us to know that if the leader is completely accquinted with the issues prevailing in the society. All of us know that people are the best source of getting an unambiguous status of society in terms of growth.
Firstly, feedback from people whom the leader is going to lead is highly granular and authentic which gives a clear picture of the society. People express their views to the leader if they are happy with the implemented laws or how can the existing regulations can be augmented to resolve the issues in a better way. Sometimes, leaders find some of the social issues very superficial and ignores them. For example, in some of the schools in India students are not getting proper infrastructure which is impeding their growth. The school authorities never report these kind of issues for some of their ilicit benifits. But if leader will ineteract with these students or parents of these students then the leader could get a clear picture.
Furthermore, this interactin will be great opportunity for both people as well as the leader because it will make people feel attached and responsible towards roles in the society and people will also find the leader as trustworthy and a responsible person. Also, it will act as a morale check among people. Leader will easily get to know if the people support him in his acts or not.
Finally, it will reduce the task of leader and hence the leader can easily focus on finding solutions for each prevailing issues instead of searching for issues. Also, it will help to eradicate the biased judgment sometimes taken by the leaders.
So considering all the above points, I believe that best leaders are those wjo encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
- "It is dangerous to trust only intelligence." 39
- Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 50
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...n a better way. Sometimes, leaders find some of the social issues very superficial and igno...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...icial and ignores them. For example, in some of the schools in India students are not getti...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 563, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...th. The school authorities never report these kind of issues for some of their ilicit beni...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ll be great opportunity for both people as well as the leader because it will make people ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, well, for example, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 326.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8282208589 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57173055262 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51226993865 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.9650544548 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.933333333 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320524657173 0.243740707755 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110722917823 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147580379375 0.0758088955206 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218798451429 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19147093284 0.0667264976115 287% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.