The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
An effective leadership requires considering feedback from the people being led. I'm a staunch supporter of this belief. If a leader seldom considers the opinions of his/her constituents, then it would certainly give rise to internal dissension. People would soon desert the cause or worse, they could hatch a coup. All of the above would also certainly hurt the cause for which they are arduously working.
History has taught us how oppression by rulers led to the fall of their kingdoms. This was primarily due to the ruler's indifference towards the pleas of those he led. When a person is obdurate in changing their ways, which may be pernicious to the goals they want to achieve a, even his most staunch supporters would turn against him.
A great example for this is Steve Jobs, although a great visionary, his complete disregard for the employees' needs served as the primary reason for him being ousted from the very company he created. The shareholders of Apple, who were once Steve's friends, hatched a coup to remove him from the position of CEO for the well being of the company.
As the phrase "Too many cooks spoil the broth" suggests, sometimes it is okay for a leader to enforce their opinions for the welfare of their cause. But, such situations arise only if the people they are leading are inexperienced and have a limited amount of knowledge concerning the work that needs to be done. Even after this, it is still better for the leader to at least listen to the opinions of his followers and help shape those opinions as well. Such encouragement would increase the subordinates self-esteem and willingness to take initiative.
If a leader listens to the pleas of his pupil, considers them as a valid opinion and changes his plans accordingly, then both his regime as well as the people's support for him will be benefited. Hence, only then would his leadership be effective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ing feedback from the people being led. Im a staunch supporter of this belief. If ...
^^
Line 1, column 316, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: All the
...ause or worse, they could hatch a coup. All of the above would also certainly hurt the cau...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 113, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'rulers'' or 'ruler's'?
Suggestion: rulers'; ruler's
...kingdoms. This was primarily due to the rulers indifference towards the pleas of those...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'a'?
...cious to the goals they want to achieve a, even his most staunch supporters would ...
^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "needs served" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'serving' or 'to be served'.
Suggestion: serving; to be served
...plete disregard for the employees needs served as the primary reason for him being ous...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 138, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...plans accordingly, then both his regime as well as the peoples support for him will be ben...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, hence, if, may, so, still, then, well, at least, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 2235.4752809 71% => OK
No of words: 325.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88307692308 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67238164727 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578461538462 0.4932671777 117% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 704.065955056 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6351210546 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1875 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173162894147 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552215540961 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447632134774 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889330628432 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475635800207 0.0667264976115 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.