Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants, powerful anti-aging and immune-system boosting compounds. Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day, the greater the benefits. Green tea, however, contains moderate amounts of caffeine, a stimulant that is not without side effects, including sleeplessness, irritability, and headaches. A long-term study has found that those who drink more than three cups of green tea a day are likely to have symptoms similar to those that chronic coffee drinkers, another source of caffeine, suffer. Therefore, it is important that anyone who chooses to drink green tea limit their intake to no more than two cups a day.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The presented argument states that green tea to a excellent source of antioxidents and anti-aging compoundes and many people beleive that more green tea will give more benefits. However, green tea has caffiene, which can have negative effects on health. Thus, people need to limit green tea intake to no more than two cups in a day. This arguments' validity looks appealing, but requires more evidences and more clearity on assumptions based on which argument can be weaker or stronger.
The most important evidence required to validate this argument is percentage of caffine in the green tea. Author says that green tea contains caffeine, but didn't mention, does all the green teas' have some percentage of caffeine or not. It is possible that some green teas may not have caffeine and taking more than two cups might be beneficial to health. As author is talking about all the green teas', he need to gather about percentage of caffeine in different types of green teas. On the basis of this data, argument can strengthen or weaken.
The conclusion of this argument also based on assumption that people of all ages are having same symptomes. The symptomes can differ with age, may be people in young age can have more than two cups of green tea and doesn't feel effect of it and people in the old age may feel symptoms same as chronic coffee drinkers, after taking more than three cups of green tea. If this comes true then conclusion is vague and generalized, it can be specific.
Thus, in conclusion, the arthor needs to collect data from people of mutilple parts of country or from different countries about their green tea drinking habits and health effects, he might need to gather data from doctors also to check how many are suffering health issues due to more green tea intake. All this information when analyzed may lead to support or oppose the conslusion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ented argument states that green tea to a excellent source of antioxidents and an...
^
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'arguments'' or 'argument's'?
Suggestion: arguments'; argument's
...to no more than two cups in a day. This arguments validity looks appealing, but requires ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...s that green tea contains caffeine, but didnt mention, does all the green teas have s...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ave more than two cups of green tea and doesnt feel effect of it and people in the old...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, then, thus, in conclusion, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.6327345309 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 13.6137724551 59% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 55.5748502994 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 16.3942115768 55% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 2260.96107784 69% => OK
No of words: 322.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8198757764 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43600235641 2.78398813304 88% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 204.123752495 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493788819876 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 705.55239521 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.471057884232 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.76447105788 57% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2641926635 57.8364921388 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.857142857 119.503703932 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.324526521 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 5.70786347227 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.20758483034 85% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316919014779 0.218282227539 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125523289849 0.0743258471296 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106410274989 0.0701772020484 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213779553141 0.128457276422 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079975999361 0.0628817314937 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.3799401198 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.3550499002 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.197005988 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.32208582834 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.