Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The policy in which the universities require students to take up courses only within those fields they are interested in studying, sounds quite good and effective. According to the current university course structure, a student is required to pay attention to a wide array of fields. The courses include various subjects which may not be needed in the student's pursued field of interest but have to be cumpalsorily finished in order to pass the exam and obtain a certain degree.
If universities restrict the courses to desired interest fields of students, it would help in reducing the time span for completing the courses and receiving the degree. This would help in making the students an early contributor towards the society. Not only, it would help in reducing the time span, it would also help the students financially. The more number of years the students have to devote in an educational programme would be cut down and hence the amount of fees would also be cut down in the same ratio. This would ease out financial burden on students to a considerable extent. Interest oriented subjects would mean that students would give their full attention to these. They would put their heart and soul to complete these courses and their goals would be reached earlier in time. Let us say, if a student wants to be a journalist, and his course structure compells him to study computers and few science subjects in the first year, it would completely be futile for the student. Similary if a student wishes to pursue engineering and the course structure includes economics and communication subjects, it would prove to worthless for them as well.
Though this policy of taking up selective courses based on interest of a student can be very beneficial, there are certain cases where this kind of a policy might fail. There are students who are undecided about which career they would like to pursue in future. These students would want to give a try to everything bit by bit and gradually decide what they really want to take up. If the courses become restricted, these students would have to choose among the pool of courses and might end up choosing a wrong one instead. If this happens, this policy would turn out to be reverse of effective for them. Also, there are certain subjects which should be mandatory for students so that they keep up good manners, discipline, respect for elders and concern towards the environment.
Therefore, if the universities require students to take courses in their fields of interests, it would be yielding positive results. But, just like a coin has two sides, the effect of the policy wouldn't prove to be effetive in certain scenarios as mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the exam and obtain a certain degree. If universities restrict the courses to ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld prove to worthless for them as well. Though this policy of taking up selectiv...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
...ial, there are certain cases where this kind of a policy might fail. There are students w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... which career they would like to pursue in future. These students would want to give a tr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 782, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs and concern towards the environment. Therefore, if the universities require s...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 196, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...has two sides, the effect of the policy wouldnt prove to be effetive in certain scenari...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, really, so, therefore, well, kind of, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 458.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90174672489 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62611441266 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6007666461 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.484716157205 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 690.3 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9544285031 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226690245819 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091691371021 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894095339932 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184684805131 0.150359130593 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.079988595302 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.