Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
Students are the future of a society and the education they acquires shapes the future. University level of education is somewhat the highest level of education. Students enrolling in universities are supposedly mature enough to make their own preferences. The curriculum in university level education should be designed and implemented so that students could acquire knowledge related to their fields of interest. Expertise in a certain field, which is preferable to the student, in later term can be immensely advantageous to the society.
First of all, in all countries, before partaking in university level education, students are required to complete preliminary level studies. As they are naive, they society takes it on their shoulder to design a comprehensive curriculum that can be implemented for the young minds. Schools and colleges should follow a single standard in those education levels. These early education helps the young minds to acquire general knowledge about the world, about ethics, about responsibilities and about life. The generalize knowledge they acquire, makes them mature enough to make decisions and persuade them to choose a field of interest.
So, formally, when a student enroll into university, he/she should be capable of choosing and partaking in classes preferable to his/her field of interest. If universities constrain them to a generalize curriculum even in this level, their talent will remain hidden. For example, a student persueing a career in electrical engineering will not find it advantageous to study English literature. He/she might find this course asserting unnecessary load on the curriculum and sometimes students even lose interest due to these unavoidable loads. Their results on the test gradually decreases and even though having enough talent to shine in their perspective field, the student is deemed unworthy in his field. one of the prominent reason for dropout in university level is losing interest in the field the students, themselves, choose.
In contrast, some generalize subjects like ethics in the field of study, economics, social study, English grammar etc. should not be taken out from the curriculum. Even though it is much advantageous to study subjects related to the field, the impact of these generalize subjects in every field of work is undeniable. To live and build a career in a society, knowledge on ethics, sociology and economics is a must.
In conclusion, instead of asserting unnecessary load on the students by making them take too many unrelated courses, the university curriculum should exercise providing students with enough independence so that they can choose which courses they should study, in order to pursue a successful career. It is proven by the curriculum of top ranked universities that stringent structure of university courses will not come out on top in the advance society. To make students talent useful in the world, universities must exercise malleable structure in order to facilitate students interest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 61, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'acquire'
Suggestion: acquire
...ure of a society and the education they acquires shapes the future. University level of ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... about responsibilities and about life. The generalize knowledge they acquire, makes them matu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rest. If universities constrain them to a generalize curriculum even in this level, their ta...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 709, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...tudent is deemed unworthy in his field. one of the prominent reason for dropout in ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2560.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44680851064 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94918791717 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463829787234 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 821.7 704.065955056 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0720800298 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.304347826 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4347826087 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95652173913 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340913109635 0.243740707755 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965142418133 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577855889549 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195795593605 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675309054906 0.0667264976115 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.