The way a message is delivered is often more important than the message itself.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In our modern cultural landscape, one could make the argument that the line between stardom and talent has blurred; some become famous without talent while others take years for their talent to be noticed by others. Moreover, for those with notorious reputations, fame may interfere with an honest assessment of what could be called "real" talent. This is true for all artists, and musicians are no exception. From Elvis to Mozat, there have been a myriad of examples throughout history when fame interferes with our assessment of talent.
Before the romantic era of classical music, Mozart's works were not as universally acclaimed as one might imagine, a consequence of Mozart's famous temperment. It was understood at the time that the man was talented, but his music was not consdiered to be as memorable as we would classify it today. In fact, the opera Don Giovani was only screened a handful of times in the Vienna opera house before being replacd by another production. The reason was simple, Mozart was famous for outlandish performances, but the opera he presented was not in-line with past works. This does not diminish the masterful musical talent on display during a performance, but Mozart's fame reduced the ability of people to assess the quality of his art. Only after many years did the world come to understand the talent present throughout his body of work.
More recently, Elvis Presley - the King of Rock and Roll - is another example of a man whose musical talent was overshadowed by his fame. Elvis' hit singles like Jailhouse Rock were panned as crass examples of modern musical artwork, a derivative of the Jazz and Blues which had recently become popular throughout the United States. This perspective was influenced by Elvis' famous dance-work, which was seen negativley by the more conservative, older generations. However, years after his death, it a common understanding that Elvis helped elevate the art of Blues into the next frontier, paving the way for a new generation of artists.
It is conceitvable that talent and fame are independent variables contributing to the assessment of a musician's career. Consider those unnamed musicians without access to recording studios or producers capable of distribuing truly talented songs to the public. Additionally, consider the famous artists of our day who employ auto-tune technology to activley change their untalented voices into perfepopular works of art. However, when true talent is given the chance to be heard, fame tends to follow as popularity inspires many to follow. For this reason, fame must necessarily interfere with popular musicians.
The work of popular musical artists is tied to that of their fame. A musician famous for their negative traits will have that negativity seep into the common understading of their work, and vice versa. Only after time has passed, when future generations can review musical works without the biases created by fame, can true talent be accuratley assessed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2518.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20247933884 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77382434716 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 801.0 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5670447306 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.454545455 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.31818181818 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0571659733552 0.243740707755 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0197670641845 0.0831039109588 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0241417515519 0.0758088955206 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0348501258802 0.150359130593 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021479088095 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 14.1 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 100.480337079 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.