Indeed, The way or manner in which one conveys the message can drastically differentiate the outcome of the message delivered.
For Instance, Bhagat Singh a martyr, in struggle for india's freedom once tried to convey a message to britishers which in a way jeopardized the situation for him. In his time, he was indulged in a bombing incident. Though he did it with sheer intelligence and made sure that nobody should get hurt because of the blast. The only thing he wanted to convey to the britishers was that Indians are no longer silent and they want freedom. Well, This incident named him a terrorist and he was hanged till death for the same. If he would have conveyed the same message like Mr. Gandhi did, using the power of non-voilence he would have been alive. This is how power of conveying a message can dfiffers in the outcome.
We can take another example to talk about the way of conveying a message. Let's say there is a team and due to some urgent work a manger needs to call his team to work on weekends. Now he can either be rude and dominating like a typical boss and call them to work for weekend by shooting mail or by a small meeting. On the contrary, what he can do is he can ask politely to everybody and explain them the entire scenario that why there is a need for everyone to come. He can say that everyone of you is so important and it'll be a chaos without the help from all team members on weekend.
Though, there are always ways in which we can improve the delivery of a message, but there are people who uses this art to get what they want. Also, some people uses the art of words and leave mild sarcasam in the sentences. This kind of sarcasam is not comprehended by everyone because they mould it in such a way that he looks like a polite sentence though it is actually sarcastic and insulting.
Nonetheless, we can say that the power or way to deliver or convey a message is essential to impart proper meaning to what one wants to portray. If the message is conveyed in a wrong way it can even lead to horrendous situations and meaning of the same message.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 526, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had conveyed'?
Suggestion: had conveyed
...s hanged till death for the same. If he would have conveyed the same message like Mr. Gandhi did, u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 75, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...k about the way of conveying a message. Lets say there is a team and due to some urg...
^^^^
Line 9, column 173, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... to portray. If the message is conveyed in a wrong way it can even lead to horrendous situatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, look, nonetheless, so, well, for instance, kind of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.39230769231 5.05705443957 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45067715957 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.502564102564 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7316530458 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.1666666667 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146054776277 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495808798012 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486062445505 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948689629189 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431538617162 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.18 12.1639044944 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.