"We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own. "disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning"
We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own; "disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning."
Do we learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own? The writer contends so for the reason disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.
I concede that undue discord can impede learning. Otherwise, my point of view is we can learn much more from discord, debate and discussion with those whose views we contradict than those whose views we share.
Admittedly, In some circumstances like today's clamorous TV debates where people are just shouting to their voice to be listen rather than debating with scruples and facts, In such case, we generally learn nothing , such debate and discord definitely can cause and impede learning. In today's Teli vision people are just shouting and shouting, such discord cannot flourish knowledge. In such case the writer can be true.
Aside this, If both the debater are of the same field and have profound knowledge in their field, then in such case the discord can trigger learning. In such case , the two debater should be of the same field so that they agree with fundamental terms.
In sum, I partially agree that we usually learn from people whose views we share than from those whose views we contradict, in all case I cannot agree with the writer's assertion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-26 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-15 | Mirza Raquib | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-14 | Mirza Raquib | 54 | view |
| 2023-10-07 | MEHUL DESAI | 66 | view |
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 58
- Only through mistakes can there be discovery or progress 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 60
- The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 50
- The following letter is from a group of Linford College alumni to the chair of the art department at the college In a recent survey of college graduates 90 percent agree that participating in an internship increased their chances of finding a job after gr 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 80, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...todays clamorous TV debates where people are just shouting to their voice to be l...
^^
Line 6, column 214, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...In such case, we generally learn nothing , such debate and discord definitely can...
^^
Line 6, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... case, we generally learn nothing , such debate and discord definitely can cause ...
^^
Line 6, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nitely can cause and impede learning. In todays Teli vision people are just shout...
^^
Line 6, column 402, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not flourish knowledge. In such case the writer can be true. Aside this, If bo...
^^^
Line 8, column 20, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iter can be true. Aside this, If both the debater are of the same field and ha...
^^
Line 8, column 164, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...scord can trigger learning. In such case , the two debater should be of the same f...
^^
Line 8, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...should be of the same field so that they agree with fundamental terms. In sum,...
^^
Line 10, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ree with fundamental terms. In sum, I partially agree that we usually learn fr...
^^
Line 10, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...whose views we contradict, in all case I cannot agree with the writers assertion....
^^^^^
Line 10, column 166, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'writers'' or 'writer's'?
Suggestion: writers'; writer's
...in all case I cannot agree with the writers assertion.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 2235.4752809 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 241.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01244813278 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54021158511 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 215.323595506 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45643153527 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 355.5 704.065955056 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.8806448436 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.8 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.2 5.21951772744 23% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 7.80617977528 141% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.674994300045 0.243740707755 277% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.248476206679 0.0831039109588 299% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.285817737032 0.0758088955206 377% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.47185177513 0.150359130593 314% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.311701888628 0.0667264976115 467% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 100.480337079 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.