We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own
Learning is very important for the person's growth. Learning can be done in many ways- through self studies, group studies, exchange of ideas and views. Though self studies mainly restrict the person view points to themselves, group studies facilitate the person to share ideas and get other people view points on the subject. Exchange of knowledge helps one to learn the subject better.
While sharing the ideas with other person, the latter might agree or disagree with you. If the person agrees with you, then it might result in both of you working together on the subject and trying to find more about it from each other understanding. On the other hand, if the other person disagrees with you, then both can work subject to prove the correctness in their statements which will help both to get better insights of the subject and will get in depth knowledge of the subject.
Debates, one of the very popular forms of speech in English literature, which works on the principle that one person is for the motion and another is against the motion. Debates prove to be very helpful if one wants to know the both ends of any topic or statements as they not only cater to two different views. Same goes for the working in teams, If all the team members have same views points at any statements, then they move to the next step to enhance their knowledge about the subject and get more knowledge by working together and sharing ideas. But, even if a single team member has contradictory views on the subject, it can lead to doubts on the current analysis and statements and compel the team to do further research and gather better evidences to support their views. Thus, sharing ideas with someone who has a different view points as yours can help increase the authenticity of the statement and ideas. The contradictory point may provide us with something that one is missing in its research and helps in the logical conclusion of the ideas.
For instance, in our government assembly, whenever a bill is passed, the speaker ask for both the leading and opposition parties to present their views. If both agree on the bill, then the bill is passed and people start working on the implementation of the bill, but,if the other party disagrees, then the leading party gives evidences and supports their points with more logical and statistical data. Thus the contradictory view on the bill forces the leading party to do more research on the topic and come with the evidences to support their statements.
To conclude, sharing of ideas is one of the best way to learn things, either the views are same or contradictory, it adds on to your knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 36, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
Learning is very important for the persons growth. Learning can be done in many wa...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...helps one to learn the subject better. While sharing the ideas with other perso...
^^^
Line 7, column 268, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , if
...g on the implementation of the bill, but,if the other party disagrees, then the lea...
^^^
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...with more logical and statistical data. Thus the contradictory view on the bill forc...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'thus', 'while', 'for instance', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.249003984064 0.240241500013 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.149402390438 0.157235817809 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0637450199203 0.0880659088768 72% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0358565737052 0.0497285424764 72% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0418326693227 0.0444667217837 94% => OK
Prepositions: 0.131474103586 0.12292977631 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0298804780876 0.0406280797675 74% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.48195377031 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0398406374502 0.030933414821 129% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.117529880478 0.0997080785238 118% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0179282868526 0.0249443105267 72% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00996015936255 0.0148568991511 67% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2652.0 2732.02544248 97% => OK
No of words: 460.0 452.878318584 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7652173913 6.0361032391 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6311565067 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.317391304348 0.366273622748 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.232608695652 0.280924506359 83% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.132608695652 0.200843997647 66% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0847826086957 0.132149295362 64% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48195377031 2.79330140395 89% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 219.290929204 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.436956521739 0.48968727796 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.4061061746 55.4138127331 87% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0588235294 23.380412469 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1501457123 59.4972553346 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.0 141.124799967 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0588235294 23.380412469 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.529411764706 0.674092028746 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.21349557522 77% => OK
Readability: 50.3196930946 51.4728631049 98% => OK
Elegance: 1.80701754386 1.64882698954 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0533058325727 0.391690518653 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.202916180662 0.123202303941 165% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.106775330093 0.077325440228 138% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.643214949304 0.547984918172 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.174269081058 0.149214159877 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0293310065006 0.161403998019 18% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.02233646932 0.0892212321368 25% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.453054753973 0.385218514788 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.13000605422 0.0692045440612 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0433414584673 0.275328986314 16% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133113010267 0.0653680567796 20% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 13.0 7.22455752212 180% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.