We can learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In today's sophisticated and cosmopolitan world, people have divergent opinions regarding a specific approach. The prompt states that similar views can enhance learning rather divergent views. I mostly disagree with the prompt that people who share our view can enhance our knowledge in a better way compared to the people who have divergent opinions. The diversity in opinions, in fact, leads to better solutions and profound knowledge of a specific field.
Opposing viewpoints reflect the diversity in thinking, as well as the eclectic background from which a person belongs. And, it is of paramount importance to adhere to these different opinions, and come up with a egalitarian result, which acceptable to all. If we tend to be insular in our thinking, instead of solving a problem, it can detriment the situation to a further extent. For example, in democracy it crucial to be inclusive of all the opinions, no matter if it belongs to a majority or minority. Thus, this dialectical mechanism would be helpful in maintaining unity and peace across the country. This is the reason Parliament or Congress consists of members belonging to different sections of a country, and representing the beliefs of that section. Consequently, a outcome created by synthesising diverse beliefs would be influential and acceptable to all. Hence, this can be proved that contradictory viewpoints can lead to better results.
If a person is intransigent in his approach, then he/she may be losing on some creative measures which can be incorporated in his/her work. Diversity among the thinking helps a lot in problem solving. When a person having a tunnel vision approaches a task in a certain way which might not be acceptable to others. For instance, when a writer completes his/her book, even the famous ones, he/she sends a copy of it to the peers. This would result in getting feedbacks from people having different opinions compared to the author, and might underscore some incompatibilities or errors present in the book which can only be identified through contradictory opinions. Similarly, this is analogous to common people as well, who undertaking a task, should listen to different opinions, which would help them in thinking differently, and enhance their problem solving appraoch.
However, I concede that inculcating diverse opinions and viewpoints can sometimes be counter productive s well. When the viewpoints of two people differ on a fundamental level, it cumbersome, nearly impossible, to bring them on a same level. Moreover, this would result in increased number of disagreements and contentions at every step. Nevertheless, this happens quite rarely, and compromises made by the two parties can help they confirm on a specific viewpoint.
Conclusively, learning is a very tedious and convoluted process, and it is true that divergent viewpoint can lead to contradictions and hinder the process of development. However, in most of the time eclectic views can help build a common and more acceptable viewpoint and thus, aggrandise the learning process.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...se different opinions, and come up with a egalitarian result, which acceptable to...
^
Line 3, column 776, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... beliefs of that section. Consequently, a outcome created by synthesising diverse...
^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...hinking helps a lot in problem solving. When a person having a tunnel vision approac...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, similarly, so, then, thus, well, for example, for instance, in fact, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2588.0 2235.4752809 116% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31416837782 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08152738167 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511293634497 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 786.6 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.6861813386 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.833333333 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2916666667 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168156364976 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0467535697568 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446285440121 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937599453352 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369732154235 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.