The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority
Society is place where many people with different culture, tradition, thoughts are found, and the person, who lead the society, or works for the wellbeing of the society is known as authority. Is it appropriate to question them all the time? Obviously not. People who lead the society provide us better environment to run the things smoothly, so questioning them all the time may impede the process of decision making. Therefore, in my opinion, it depends on situation to question authority foe the well-being of the society.
Firstly, as we all are human beings: it is our nature to cast doubt on somebody. It is our inherent behavior (acquired since birth). But, sometimes, this nature of us can hinder the development process going around us. In my society, the construction process was going on, which was for the welfare of people, as it provides better condition of road to the people for travelling from one place to another. At this time, many people question the authority about the quality of materials used, durability of the road etc. It sounds good to ask this type of question, but it may discourage the authority because they want support from their people neither the doubt on their project work. As a result, due to a lot of questions, which was raise by people dissuade the authority and the development work has been stop for some time. Hence, it will not be suitable at all situations to question authority.
Consequentially, nowadays, there are a lot of work, which is being remiss by the leader of the society, which left the society behind in term of development. Many jobs which are for welfare of the people are being full of corruption: at this time people should raise question or even protest against this will be also consider a great option to extirpate corruption from the field of development. while in one place of my society construction program was being going on smoothly without any selfishness, but in another area of my place allocation of budget for the betterment of people is going on. During that time, people did not get the budget as per allocated. They started to raise a lot of question and a lot of protest about this case, which degrade the image of such authority. The better result of carrying out this type of protest by people is that it aware the authority not to do such self- oriented task. Now, as a result, they all are involved in the task which is Soley for the enhancement of the society. Eventually, questioning also plays a great role in a society foe the welfare of people.
To sum of, in a conclusion, the people who have been chosen by voting of people is known as authority. They are in power. they should do task for the welfare of the people, so it is appropriate sometimes to question authority, but all time it is not consider good because it many provide hindrance in development work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...rruption from the field of development. while in one place of my society construction...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
... known as authority. They are in power. they should do task for the welfare of the p...
^^^^
Line 7, column 183, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'appropriate'.
Suggestion: sometimes appropriate
...for the welfare of the people, so it is appropriate sometimes to question authority, but all time it ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...stion authority, but all time it is not consider good because it many provide hindrance ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, as for, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 31.0 19.5258426966 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2364.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71856287425 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67399521267 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431137724551 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 743.4 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9740850572 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.782608696 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7826086957 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5652173913 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300235254424 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847010282338 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647907566579 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199414624447 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635038389729 0.0667264976115 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.1639044944 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.