The well being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su

Essay topics:

The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The society is greatly affected by the decisions the authorities make. However, as the duration of the authorities holding power extends, there is a high possibility that they could get obscured with reality and start utilizing power regardless of the public's desire. I believe that people should always be cautious with the decisions authorities make in order to enhance the society's well-being.
First of all, being an authority provides the power to control and affect the society. If it is used for selfless purposes, it may benefit in increasing the people's welfare. However, it is also extremely difficult to resist the compelling desire to facilitate such power for selfish and greedy purposes, such as manipulating people in order to fulfill their vainglory. If people constantly challenge and question the authorities about the decisions they make, it would forestall them in stepping out of line. I would like to mention one of the former presidents in South Korea. For three years, she had used her authoritative power to found ghost companies that provided financial support for the government. The public had invested in the companies believing it must be reliable and would provide profitable success. However, people started questioning the whereabouts of the companies' locations and whether it really was an actual company. As this suspicion attracted more people, the public started questioning the purposes of the president's usage of power. Her actions started to be perceived dubious and legal authorities started searching for evidences that the president was utilizing power for her own selfish needs. Eventually, her transgressions rose up to the surface, leading her getting arrested and being sentenced to jail. If people weren't constantly questioning and challenging the authority, such truculent behavior would have continued until this day.
Furthermore, people always being suspicious of the authority's usage of power enhances the effect of the public in affecting the society. If people are not discerned with the policies, then it would be providing authorities the opportunity to start neglecting the public's desires. However, if the public is always cautious of all the actions the authorities make, the authorities would have to provide germane policies regardless of their will, in order to maintain their current status, which would lead to enhancing the public's welfare. For example, Google, which is known to be the number one prestigious company nationwide, has all eyes and ears of the world overlooking the CEO's decision. Due to this, even though the CEO has selfish purposes, it is immensely difficult for him/her to weasel out of their suspicious glances and pursue their greedy needs. Consequently, the CEO created many policies that enables the employees to work in encouraging environments and ensures that they are taken well care of. Because people were cautious and dubious about the authorities in their usage of power, the CEO had to fulfill the requirements of the people's desires which led to making Google one of the best companies people would like to work for.
To sum up, having people constantly being cautious and questioning the authority inhibits them from exploiting power for certain malignant needs and increasing the discern in providing better policies for people. Due to such reason, I believe many people should question the authority and increase the well-being of the society.

Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:


Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1034, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'presidents'' or 'president's'?
Suggestion: presidents'; president's
...started questioning the purposes of the presidents usage of power. Her actions started to ...
Line 2, column 1348, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: weren't
... and being sentenced to jail. If people werent constantly questioning and challenging ...
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... certain malignant needs and increasing the discern in providing better policies for people...

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, look, may, really, so, then, well, for example, such as, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2906.0 2235.4752809 130% => OK
No of words: 543.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35174953959 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82725184711 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82646351669 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46408839779 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 889.2 704.065955056 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.687331622 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.083333333 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.625 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54166666667 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189719490877 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661839255928 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458018391196 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143886303778 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267650735117 0.0667264976115 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 100.480337079 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.