Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Logic must always have a starting point from which to grow. When humans had no knowledge of science, the only logical answer to the origin of life was that a deity created it. When evolution was discovered, the logical answer was that humans originated from single celled organisms which were able to develop mechanisms for mitosis and eventually complex organisms. The premise from which to begin making logical steps is key to obtaining the correct answer, and the same applies to decision making. When an emotion is taken as the root from which the logic tree grows, there is a risk that the person takes of being dissatisfied later on with the decision they made. This is because emotion is not constant, fading as time from the event which caused the emotion increases. The decision may not be subjectively bad from the makers point of view, but objectively without the personal understanding of the emotion, will not be a logical decision.
Decisions which originate in emotion could have fatal consequences. For example, there is a patient who is suitable for organ donation and another which is in desperate need of an organ, however the donor does not hold a donation card so the next of kin must make the decision. The next of kin may be in a highly emotional state, arguing that organ donation would defile the body of the deceased, or is not accepted in their religion, justifying it from there. The decision originating in logic would be to prevent another death, donating the organ with no hesitation. In another situation, riling someone up to make them emotional may be a tactic to making them make a bad decision. For example a pushy salesman warning of the limited stock, causing the person to be stressed into buying something that they would not usually purchase. Certainly in this case starting from the logical position of whether the item was needed or not would cause much less future regret.
Highly successful people such as CEOs have a reputation for making hard decisions- decisions that many would find distasteful when looked at from an emotional point of view, but when looked at objectively would make sense. This is the reason why psychopaths are able to be so successful and work highly stressful jobs- because emotion does not cloud their judgement, allowing them to make decisions which are logical and in their best interests.
However, this may be a boon as much as it may be self serving. Emotion is an evolutionary development which brings humans closer. Empathy allows us to put ourselves in the shoes of others, and do things that are purely selfless. If we always took the logical position, we would never be able to justify to ourselves giving charity, or helping a stranger. In this case emotion is a vital lifeblood of a cohesive society, without decisions based on emotion and justified by logic we would have much more self interest and possibly crime.
Decision making must be practised, and a taste for when using emotion or logic is most suitable. We do not allow young people to vote till they are 18, but we give them practice situations to vote at school. Complete detachment is not the answer, however empathy and emotion should be considered with caution, and time must be given for emotion to fade and allow good judgement to prevail.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uch as CEOs have a reputation for making hard decisions- decisions that many woul...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 19.5258426966 189% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 23.0 11.3162921348 203% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2750.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 565.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86725663717 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87542086881 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55474080936 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 263.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465486725664 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 870.3 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6449721914 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.583333333 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5416666667 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.20833333333 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0869170099066 0.243740707755 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346525077781 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346999012554 0.0758088955206 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0544183152468 0.150359130593 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216385721357 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 100.480337079 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.