Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The given issue task takes either of the two extreme stand, which are, to abandon one's own principles for the sake of public or to adamantly stick to them. But an effecient and able leader should be able to strike a balance between these two mentioned positions.
The given issue task takes either of the two extreme stand, which are, to abandon one's own principles for the sake of public or to adamantly stick to them. But an efficient and able leader should be able to strike a balance between these two mentioned positions.
To begin with, any good leader must possess qualities such as incisiveness, perceptive understanding, foresight, and moral & ethical principles that guides him to lead a group or congregation to their desired goal. These qualities and principles make a huge contribution while making important decisions. So, if a political leader abides strongly by morals such as honestly, generosity, evenhandedness, he is more likely to care for the welfare of his people. And thus, contribute more to the society. Public opinion for a particular task must be weighed, assessed, and deliberated to come to conclusion of it's usefulness. If a public opinion is likely to create fractions in the society, then such opinions should not be followed just to gain popularity or for the sake of compromise. It can do more harm than good.
In the other view of being committed to one's own principles irrespective of the masses thoughts, is also not viable. A good leader is one who keeps his people satisfied and urges them to do better. A leader who consistently adheres to his own objectives might fail to see the big picture. A efficient leader tries to understand the demands and needs of his people and strives to achieve them for their well being.
Therefore, I believe that an efficient leader is one who knows when to abandon his principles and when to abide by them and thus works diligently for the progress of the public on the whole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given issue task takes either of the...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...een these two mentioned positions. To begin with, any good leader must poss...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...se. It can do more harm than good. In the other view of being committed to ...
^^
Line 9, column 292, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...ives might fail to see the big picture. A efficient leader tries to understand th...
^
Line 9, column 292, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ives might fail to see the big picture. A efficient leader tries to understand th...
^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...achieve them for their well being. Therefore, I believe that an efficient l...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, honestly, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, such as, on the whole, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1414.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 288.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90972222222 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85684514063 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 215.323595506 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569444444444 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 448.2 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6424541592 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5714285714 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 5.21951772744 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0834371308703 0.243740707755 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310017743428 0.0831039109588 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0307865000482 0.0758088955206 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0525454641887 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312911675946 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.