The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
Given is the table providing information about consumer expenditure on different items in five countries in 2002.
It can be observed that Turkey ranked first with 32,14 % of consumption of foods, drinks and tobacco and was marginally ahead of Ireland, Spain , Italy and Sweden with percentage of 28,91 %, 18,80 %, 16,36 % and 15.77 % respectively. There also was marked difference on consumer spending on clothing and footwear among the given countries precisely, the biggest (9,00%) and the smallest (5,40 %) belongs to Italy and Sweden accordingly.
Referring to the table it also reveals that Turkey lead again with the greatest proportion (4,35 %) of national consumer expenditure on leisure and education. In this occasion Italy and Sweden showed practically the same amount ( around 3,20 %). In comparison with other countries Spain spent minimal quantity on these items, only 1,98 %.
Overall, it can be noted that the percentages fluctuated depending on indicated items and the given countries in 2002.
- The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia's share of Japanese tourist market. 63
- Below is a map of the city of Brandfield City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area and two sites S1 and S2 have been proposed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 86
- The charts below show the results of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the costs of adult education should be shared. 53
- The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 80
- This graph illustrates the number of Chinese, Korean and Indian students who enrolled at Rice University over a five year period. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 80
wrong:32,14 %
correct: 32.14%
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 153 200
No. of Characters: 812 1000
No. of Different Words: 96 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.517 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.307 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.672 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 56 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 45 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 37 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 25 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 21.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.954 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.447 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.736 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.042 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4