The bar chart illustrates the percentage of money given to charity by British people from different age groups for 1990 and 2010. Overall, for the year 1990, the age group of 36-50 contributed the greatest percentage of money to charity which was above 40% as compared to the age group of 18-25 which contributed the least percentage which was 17%. As for the year 2010, the age group of 51-65 accounted for below 40% which was the highest percentage among the age groups.
There were three age groups in which the percentage of money being spent on charity had decreased by comparing the year 1990 and 2010 which were the age groups of 18-25, 26-35 and 36-50. The percentage of money given by these three age groups for the year 1990 were 17%, 31% and 42% respectively. In contrast, for the year 2010, the percentage for these three age groups had fallen to 7%, 24% and 35% respectively.
As for the other two age groups, the percentage of money contributed to charity had increased by few percent between the year 1990 and 2010. In the year 1990, the 51-65 age group spent 35% of money in the charity while the above 65-year-old group gave above 30% of money. In the year 2010, the 51-65 age group increased the percentage of money contributed in which the percentage was below 40% whereas the above 65-year-old group constituted 35% which was the same as the age group of 36-50.
In conclusion, there are three age groups which had the percentage of money contributed decreased whereas the other two age groups increased the percentage of money given between the year 1990 and 2010. It is surprising to note that the age groups who increased the percentage of money given to charity were above 50 years old British people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 2, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...the same as the age group of 36 50. In conclusion, there are three age groups ...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'if', 'whereas', 'while', 'as for', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.274787535411 0.268076937826 103% => OK
Verbs: 0.116147308782 0.116061578633 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.042492917847 0.0759168565197 56% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0056657223796 0.0366838410393 15% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0028328611898 0.0131127313244 22% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.152974504249 0.155750635184 98% => OK
Participles: 0.042492917847 0.0379272487307 112% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.44428406181 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0198300283286 0.0210936926555 94% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => More particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.113314447592 0.0948980150116 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => Some modal verbs wanted.
WH_determiners: 0.028328611898 0.00967000014798 293% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1739.0 1161.00487805 150% => OK
No of words: 317.0 196.9 161% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4858044164 5.90752243213 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 3.73763899035 113% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.205047318612 0.337110787985 61% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.170347003155 0.247514529752 69% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.116719242902 0.171178102325 68% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107255520505 0.112407865282 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44428406181 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.305993690852 0.546246751206 56% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 30.7961841314 49.3433353143 62% => OK
How many sentences: 11.0 8.93414634146 123% => OK
Sentence length: 28.8181818182 23.0094962315 125% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8314631233 42.9750493124 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.090909091 135.714022679 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8181818182 23.0094962315 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.636363636364 0.689975730869 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 45.8528821336 47.7609492067 96% => OK
Elegance: 3.77272727273 2.94281807926 128% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.543203598245 0.418131533498 130% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.374703488007 0.181151798455 207% => Sentence is so close to another sentence.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.127321862651 0.0850326197045 150% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.798734666043 0.706616315825 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.078407967834 0.157042692854 50% => Sentences are similar to each other in a paragraph.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.377473424581 0.228904883108 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667546593621 0.108899403657 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.61596444169 0.367819155151 167% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0299576238167 0.0812612215331 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.46065519595 0.316326947829 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310475956664 0.0921553760075 34% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70731707317 243% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.08536585366 24% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 3.16585365854 284% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.02926829268 33% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 7.1512195122 154% => OK
--------------------------
Rates: 68.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 6.0 Out of 9