The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990sSummarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make

Essay topics:

The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agriculture land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The charts are given providing an overview concerned about the basic factors why agricultural land becomes infertile and the three typical regions which suffered from the degradation in terms of various reasons during in 1990s.
It can easily be observed that the main causes of degradation were deforestation and over-grazing whereas the other items marginally effected to the land.
Regarding the pie chart the segments which express the over-grazing and deforestation were in the precedence over the rest indicating 35 % and 30 % respectively, however, over-cultivation was higher than the segment other by four times. Moving on to the table chart Europe took the priority over the rest of the countries from conducting deforestation and over-cultivation showing the total percentage of degraded land sharp 23 % though it was lower than Oceania by less than 6 %. Likewise, North America hit its peak in the category of over-grazing being the highest among others (11.3 %) whilst it revealed not using from over-cultivation by pointing 0 %.
To sum up, North America used from the items that pause the degradation of land on average being the lowest percentage among the other areas.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...tion in terms of various reasons during in 1990s. It can easily be observed that the mai...
^^^^^^^^

Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'likewise', 'regarding', 'so', 'whereas', 'to sum up']

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257142857143 0.268076937826 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.152380952381 0.116061578633 131% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0904761904762 0.0759168565197 119% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0238095238095 0.0366838410393 65% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0190476190476 0.0131127313244 145% => OK
Prepositions: 0.166666666667 0.155750635184 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0714285714286 0.0379272487307 188% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.73665147578 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0142857142857 0.0210936926555 68% => OK
Particles: 0.0047619047619 0.00175180941692 272% => Less particles wanted.
Determiners: 0.119047619048 0.0948980150116 125% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0047619047619 0.00437022459523 109% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0190476190476 0.00967000014798 197% => OK

Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1184.0 1161.00487805 102% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.9 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9797979798 5.90752243213 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73763899035 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.333333333333 0.337110787985 99% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.262626262626 0.247514529752 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.171717171717 0.171178102325 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.116161616162 0.112407865282 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73665147578 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.546246751206 108% => OK
Word variations: 55.7597962003 49.3433353143 113% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 8.93414634146 67% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 23.0094962315 143% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5161147638 42.9750493124 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 197.333333333 135.714022679 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 23.0094962315 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.689975730869 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 59.2626262626 47.7609492067 124% => OK
Elegance: 2.53658536585 2.94281807926 86% => OK

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.568371006465 0.418131533498 136% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.273020547757 0.181151798455 151% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.085072743911 0.0850326197045 100% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.881055333901 0.706616315825 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133780983717 0.157042692854 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.36635158834 0.228904883108 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829148446222 0.108899403657 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.380662363357 0.367819155151 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0848801702422 0.0812612215331 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.403854938085 0.316326947829 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375203532291 0.0921553760075 41% => OK

Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70731707317 27% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.14146341463 438% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.08536585366 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.16585365854 32% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 0.956097560976 523% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.02926829268 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 6.0 7.1512195122 84% => OK

--------------------------

Rates: 70.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay E-rater: 6.5 Out of 9