17. The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
The line graph gives information about the percentages of the people who were 65 and above for Japan, Sweden and the USA from 1940 to 2040.
It is noticeable that the populations for all the three countries had grown older and were predicted to keep the trend over the period shown. Meanwhile, the percentage of older people in Japan decreased but would experience a surge and become the highest one among the three countries.
The USA had the highest proportion of the population aged 65 and above from 1940 to 1990, with an increasing percentage from 9 to 14. The proportion of Swedish elderly saw a similar trend during this time, rose from 7% to 13%. The data about Japanese, However, demonstrated a decline in the proportion of people over 65 from 5% to 3%.
In 2040, there would be a dramatic surge for Japan, and this country would have the largest proportion of old people, with a prediction of 27% of Japanese aged 65 and above. In Sweden, over 25% of people might older than 65, which would be higher than the percentage of Americans (23%).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 228, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... during this time, rose from 7% to 13%. The data about Japanese, However, demonstra...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66844919786 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54910312367 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.9830669432 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.125 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.375 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256489146233 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111686565518 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523865603995 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149792740454 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212458707404 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.