The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features，and make comparisons where relevant
The two charts demonstrate the change in sales of Fairtrade coffee and bananas in the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden from 1999 to 2004.
It is noticeable that the consumption of coffee in the five countries had witnessed increases during the five years, while the sales of bananas had decreased in the two countries.
As we can see in the first table, in 1999, the overturn of Fairtrade coffee in Switzerland ranked on the top (3 million euros). Although its sale doubled in 2004, which turned to 6 million euros, the UK overtook its place with a surge from 1.5 million to 20 million euros. Denmark, Belgium and Sweden had minor increases in the five years, from 1.8 to 2 million, 1 to 1.7 million and 0.8 to 1 million respectively.
Looking at the second table, the sales of Fairtrade bananas in Switzerland ranked first from 1999 to 2004, with a rise from 15 to 47 million euros. The UK and Belgium also saw increases in sales in the five-year period, from 1 to 5.5 million euros and from 0.6 to 4 million euros separately. However, the consumption in Sweden and Denmark suffered falls over the years (from 1.8 million to 1 million euros and from 2 million to 0.9 million euros).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 44, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...we can see in the first table, in 1999, the overturn of Fairtrade coffee in Switzerland rank...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 992.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65727699531 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60174391368 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460093896714 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 14.1680759103 43.030603864 33% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118840161477 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774451554161 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577101064807 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110541545733 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483911724854 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.