abc

Essay topics:

abc

The pie chart demonstrates several type of vehicle which were used to travel to university primarily by student or labor workers from 2004 to 2009.

Overall, it can be clearly seen that private cars was the most favorite kind of vehicle in 2004 in the campus but this percentage decrease significantly to second position in the year 2009 after bus.

Looking at the diagram, the proportion of car in 2004 accounted for 51% of total transportation whilst this number halved in 2009 at exactly 28%. However, although the figure for bus rose steadily from 33% in 2004 to 46% in the next five years thanks to a new bus stop was built in 2006.

In the year 2004, the percentage of bicycle just about 9% but it was grew by 7% in 2006. While the amount of walking and train were the lowest groups in university but it also increased slightly by 1 or 2%.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun type seems to be countable; consider using: 'several types'.
Suggestion: several types
The pie chart demonstrates several type of vehicle which were used to travel to...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'grown'.
Suggestion: grown
...age of bicycle just about 9% but it was grew by 7% in 2006. While the amount of walk...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, second, so, while, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 702.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52903225806 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49408040062 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 201.6 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6340601177 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.215688989381 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.103423049105 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.15604864568 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.