The bar graph elucidates the average hours spend by male and females per week on unpaid work in different categories.
It is noticeable that in all of the three categories women's are engaged more as compared to men in doing unpaid work. The comparison shows, women's who had no children spend 30 hours per week to do unpaid work. On the other hand, only half of the hour's men are interested in spending on non-paying jobs per week.
In the second category, women's who had 1-2 children faced a tired working situation and work up to 50 hours, which is very low in terms of male. The last category, the married women's had 3 or more children are the most workaholic and give 60 hours on doing non-paying jobs. In contrast, married men had three plus children did not do as much work for unpaid jobs and give 14 hours per week.
In conclusion, females spend the highest time to do unpaid jobs in all the three given comparative categories and men had a similar proportion of hours in all of the above categories.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...categories. It is noticeable that in all of the three categories womens are engaged mor...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...hree categories womens are engaged more as compared to men in doing unpaid work. T...
^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...en had a similar proportion of hours in all of the above categories.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, in conclusion, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52717391304 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47128475614 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510869565217 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6314546167 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.125 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346724567973 0.215688989381 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182118791702 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114706967393 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253032174047 0.15604864568 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122089715103 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.92 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.