the bar chart below show the participation of children in selected leisure activities.
The given bar chart depicts the information of those boys and girls who participated in distinct selected free time activities in Australia.
The most striking feature to be observed is that, both boys and girls participated more in watching TV, videos.
It can be vividly seen that , in case of girls, participation in watching TV vedios led with highest 95 percents whereas electronic computer games and riding occupied second and third position with 80 and 70 percent respectively. The participation in rolling blading and art and craft were equally reported.
Turning to rest of description, boys showed less interest in art and craft activities. Watching videos and TV activity had largest participation with 95 percent followed by electronic computer games and bike riding with 80, 70 percent orderly. As far as comparison is concerned, in art and craft activity girls participated more compare to boys. Further, in other activities the boys participation was high compare to girls.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 28, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... videos. It can be vividly seen that , in case of girls, participation in watc...
^^
Line 7, column 120, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the largest'.
Suggestion: had the largest
...vities. Watching videos and TV activity had largest participation with 95 percent followed ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 380, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'boys'' or 'boy's'?
Suggestion: boys'; boy's
... boys. Further, in other activities the boys participation was high compare to girls...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, so, third, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 840.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35031847134 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01143470528 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611464968153 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4090642339 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161853416626 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765391599355 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544974119247 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104028302877 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0627473359008 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.