The bar chart below shows information about water use worldwide (Km3) from three different sectors between 1910 and 2010.
How many km3 water in the world was consumed by the agricultural sector, industrial use, and domestic use during 100 years since 1910 are depicted by the graph. Overall, the most significant fact to emerge from the graph is that the figure for agriculture showed its superiority over that for other sectors in the use of water. In addition, not only did the timeline experiences an increase in the worldwide water used by the agricultural sector but that by industrial use and domestic use as well.
In 1910, it is clearly seen that agriculture have the larger number of water use worldwide, which was accounted for around 500. This was followed by the level of industrial use and domestic use. While the former was recorded at roughly 20, the latter was noted at approximately 10 -the smallest number in this statistical data.
1000 years later, water used by the agricultural sector rocketed dramatically by nearly 500%. Moreover, there was a similar pattern in the number of worldwide water consumed by the industrial sector, witnessing a significant growth to roughly 1500 at the end of the period. However, the figure for domestic use is again the exception, with a slight rise of about 140.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: '-the the smallest'.
Suggestion: -the the smallest
...he latter was noted at approximately 10 -the smallest number in this statistical data. 100...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1000.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92610837438 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74570339554 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56157635468 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 316.8 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0285792465 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239142437518 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112961207762 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562644165076 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170688772586 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073162989204 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.