The bar chart illustrates the number of students in millions attending three types of courses (A, B and C) in four different years, from 2001 to 2004.
Overall, number of students attending course A and B, showed some fluctuation with slight increase in the final year. Whereas, a dramatic rise is evident in number of students who were attending course C. Furthermore, course A was most popular among students in the first year, while at the end of the period course C became most favourite.
In terms of course A, over 4 million students attended in 2001, this, then fell to around half in next year, before rising in next two years and reached at nearly 4.5 million and became second most popular course following course C in the final year. Similarly, at the start of the period, attendance of course B ( around over 2 million ) was nearly half of the course A. This figure, then, climbed sharply to approximately 4.5 million, before falling back to less than 2 million in 2003 and rise again under 3 million in the last year.
On the other hand, attendance of course C ( 2 million ) was stable in the first two years. However, number of students attended course C, experienced a significant increase in 2003 and 2004 ( 3 million and 5 million respectively ) and it became the most popular course attended by students at the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: evident
...final year. Whereas, a dramatic rise is evident in number of students who were attending course C...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rt of the period, attendance of course B around over 2 million was nearly half o...
^^
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dance of course B around over 2 million was nearly half of the course A. This fi...
^^
Line 7, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the other hand, attendance of course C 2 million was stable in the first two y...
^^
Line 7, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... hand, attendance of course C 2 million was stable in the first two years. Howev...
^^
Line 7, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a significant increase in 2003 and 2004 3 million and 5 million respectively an...
^^
Line 7, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...04 3 million and 5 million respectively and it became the most popular course at...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, similarly, so, then, whereas, while, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6906779661 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57628164026 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487288135593 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.3418974605 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.0 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7777777778 5.23603664747 225% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298984135522 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163829378179 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156640700016 0.0843802449381 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.264406993368 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.183860931053 0.0819641961636 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.