The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.

The bar chart illustrates the percentage of travellers in a European city, used the four various types of transport means ( bus, car, bike and foot) for work in three different years 1960, 1980 and 2000.

Overall, a dramatic increase in percentage of people used car for travelling to and from work while proportion of travellers used bike and foot, experienced a significant decrease, in a given period. Furthermore, bus usage showed fluctuation during the time frame.

In terms of car, only 5% people used it as a travelling mode for work purpose in 1960, this figure rose sharply to around 22% in 1980 and hitting the highest point at 35% at the end of the period and became the most favourite transport mean used by the people among rest other modes.

In 1960, bike used by less than quarter travellers, this, then, drop significantly to 5% in the last year. Similarly, in the beginning of period, around 33% people travelled to and from work by walk and it was the most favourite travelling mode than rest other. This figure then fell sharply to around 16% in 1980 and 8% in 2000. Whereas, nearly 18% people used bus in 1960, which, then, jumped up to 25% in 1980, again declined to approximately 15%, at the end of the period.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...strates the percentage of travellers in an European city, used the four various ty...
^^
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he four various types of transport means bus, car, bike and foot for work in thre...
^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nced a significant decrease, in a given period of time. Furthermore, bus usage showed fluctuat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'traveller'?
Suggestion: traveller
... 1960, bike used by less than a quarter travellers, this, then, drop significantly to 5% i...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, similarly, then, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1029.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65610859729 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57288266947 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.3587903179 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.625 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348560094716 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145526677712 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933655317071 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225038171258 0.15604864568 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792090824779 0.0819641961636 97% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.