Study cost for children entails considerable amount of money so the government of some nations defray some or full expenses of education. In my opinion, I consider that payment of fees by government is beneficial for individual and society as well but there are also drawbacks to be taken into account.
Despite the drawbacks below, I believe that settling the cost of education by administrative department of government is extremely helpful for children's future and social development of nation as well. Firstly, every child can attend the school regardless of their families' financial situations. For instance, sometime it is extremely hard for parents to send their kids to schools because of low family income and not sufficient to meet the cost of education. In this scenario, covering up the fees by official body of country helps parents to meet the educational requirements of their children. Secondly, it brings social equality among children of various social background. In other words, pupils come to school from socially different families and get the same education that avoid any kind of inequality in their future job market.
Admittedly, there are some issues involved when government pays expense of study. One problem is that families totally depend upon the nation's expenditure for their child's education and overlook the overall performance of the kids. For example, some parents ignore the attitude of pupil towards study, their attendance and other skills due to negligible fees or no cost at all. However, this situation is rare in this competitive world. Another negative aspect is that sometimes government seeks for educational fund by cutting down budget allocation for other services such as healthcare, transport, elderly pension.
In conclusion, government responsibility of institutional expense of study avoid parent's stress for successful future of their children and brings social equality and clearly preponderate any disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...s that families totally depend upon the nations expenditure for their childs education ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50986842105 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94228113294 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585526315789 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1842732202 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.642857143 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157736033187 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0615495752207 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605293404291 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10503750188 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0425900111429 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.