The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age groups in the USA between 1890 and 2000.
The bar chart illustrates the proportion of USA commuters who lived alone in various age over a period 150 years, from 1890 to 2000.
Overall, it is clear that the number of people living alone increased through out the time shown. Also, people who aged at 55-64 had a large majority of living alone.
In the year 1850, people had age group at 37-46,47-54 and 55-64 accounted for nearly 3%. In 1990, those living alone who aged at 27-36 appeared with over than 2%. And other age groups at that time just were sightly higher than that of 27-36.
In 1950, the following 50 years, a little proportion of people who lived alone at 17-26 appeared and continuously increased until the amount had more double and reached at 8%. The other age groups live alone gradual developed significantly. Especially people at 55-64, in 1950, the amount just stood at nearly 10%. But in 2000, it went up to 17% and accounted for the largest proportion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...number of people living alone increased through out the time shown. Also, people who aged a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 169, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l the amount had more double and reached at 8%. The other age groups live alone g...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 771.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67272727273 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38706338947 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.7266956579 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.1 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289337722591 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129633872146 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825350147275 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205237479536 0.15604864568 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696928754157 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.73 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.