The bar chart below shows the results of a survey conducted
by a personnel department at a major company. The survey
was carried out on two groups of workers: those aged from
18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their
work performance
The chart illustrates factors affecting employees’ work performance between two age group of 18 to 30 and 45 to 60 years old in a survey. The personnel department of a company conducted this survey. Overall, the most effective factors were chance of personal development and money for younger and elderly group, respectively. While the least important one were work environment and job security, in turn.
Chance of development was the most important factor for young group at 90%, while its importance for elderly workers was nearly half. Another factor was money, which accounted for approximately equal percentage for both group (70%). The proportion of relaxed working environment effect in young group stood at 80%, whereas that of elderly workers was more than twice as low at 30%. Another major difference between two groups was promotion prospects, in which young workers recorded 25% more than elderly. There was no difference for factor of team spirit in two groups.
Two least significant factors for elderly and young worker were job security and work environment at 20% and 30%, respectively. Other factors such as competent boss, job satisfaction, and respect from colleagues stood at nearly the same importance at around 45%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on of relaxed working environment effect in young group stood at 80%, whereas th...
^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...nt factors for elderly and young worker were job security and work environment at ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 65, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...ctors for elderly and young worker were job security and work environment at 20% ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5303030303 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99283656538 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585858585859 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8911756223 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299302544015 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148464016043 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104110870754 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217063211161 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0816163895547 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.