The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance.

Essay topics:

The bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company. The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers: those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and shows factors affecting their work performance.

The given vertical bar graph highlights the information about the 10 factors affecting work performance of workers carried out survey on 2 age groups: 18-30 and 45-60 by a personal department at a major company. The data is calibrated in per centum.

It can be seen that team spirit and work environment have equal effect on the performance of workers in the age group 18-30 and 45-60. Which are 60% and 30% respectively. Not only chance of personal development, but also relaxed working environment have more effect on the performance of workers of age group 18-30 in comparison to workers of age group 45-60. Which is being led by 50%. In addition to this, there are minute difference in the performance of workers of age group 18-30 and 45-60 affecting by both money and job satisfaction.

Moving further, 80% of workers of age group 18-30 and 50% of workers of the group 45-60 are being affected by the promotional prospects. Apart from all this, workers of age group 18-30 do not lead the workers of age group 45-60 in both respect for colleagues and competent. Moreover, performance of workers of age group 18-60 have been affected by three factors: promotion prospects, job security and respect by 80%, 40% and 40 % respectively.

Overall, it is evident that workers of age group 18-30 are being affected more by these factors, whereas workers of age group 45-60 are less affected.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-01 Mattia95 78 view
2018-09-04 Mandeepkaur123 56 view
2018-09-04 Mandeepkaur123 56 view
2018-06-28 Love kaler 56 view
2018-06-27 nikhil dutt 67 view
Essays by user nikhil dutt :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 361, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mparison to workers of age group 45-60. Which is being led by 50%. In addition to thi...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, whereas, apart from, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1160.0 965.302439024 120% => OK
No of words: 237.0 196.424390244 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89451476793 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74442768926 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481012658228 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.811183182 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.454545455 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326651501878 0.215688989381 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.158242654031 0.103423049105 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101761152605 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250858850764 0.15604864568 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551306174247 0.0819641961636 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.54 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.