The table below shows the number of medals won by the top ten countries in London 2012 Olympic games.
The given tabular chart highlights the information about the number of Gold, silver and bronze medals won by top 10 countries during London Olympic games in the year 2012. The rank was determined by number of achieved Gold medal. It is clear and coherent representation.
It can be seen that in London Olympic games during the year 2012, United States had won maximum number of medals in which gold were 46, with equal number of silver and bronze medals. Apart this, 88 medals was won by China. Moreover, number of gold medals was being won by Great Britain, Russia and South Korea were 29, 24 and 13 respectively.
Moving further, least number of medals had won by Australia during London Olympic games in the year 2012. In addition to this, Germany won 11 gold, 19 silver and 14 bronze medals. Equal number of gold medals had been won by Germany and France. Furthermore, total number of medals won by France, Italy and hungry were 34, 28 and 17 respectively.
Overall, it is evident that United States had won maximum number of Gold medals whereas, Australia was minimum number of Gold medals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...4 and 13 respectively. Moving further, least number of medals had won by Australia d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, so, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78534031414 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38482681132 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.476439790576 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1733220587 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0909090909 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3636363636 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330087132811 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.152421182573 0.103423049105 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0925043558907 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239740662511 0.15604864568 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061432155451 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.