The given tabular chart demonstrate the count of medals that won in Olympic Games by the top ten different countries in the London 2012.
It is evident from the given table that the medals won by different countries were made of gold, silver and bronze in Olympic Games. However, it is clear that United States had won greatest number of medals with the total of 104 which was followed by China that is 88. Whereas, Hungry was won the lowest number of medals with the total of 17 and the medals were won by France was double than former that is 34.
Moving further, it is vivid from the tabular chart that Russia was significantly more successful at winning medals with a total of 82 than the Great Britain with the overall number of medals that is 65. Moreover, the difference between the number of medals that were won by Germany and Australia is only 9. Additionally, Italy and South Korea were won the equal number of total medals that is 28.
Overall, it can be said that in the London 2012 Olympic Games the number of gold medals were won maximum than silver which was followed by bronze medals in top ten countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'won the greatest'.
Suggestion: won the greatest
...ver, it is clear that United States had won greatest number of medals with the total of 104 ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l number of medals that is 65. Moreover, the difference between the number of med...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 7.0 271% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54901960784 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2217511996 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450980392157 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5351960632 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411741185966 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209598618441 0.103423049105 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107347445747 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.297846777173 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0835707339351 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.